Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fixed Income topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff outlines expansion of fixed-income allocation, new public-credit risk framework

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff told the retirement board it is growing the fixed-income and cash allocation and has developed a public-credit portfolio construction framework that sets tracking-error, information-ratio and sector guardrails for manager selection and implementation.

At the board meeting, staff presented the pension system’s annual public fixed-income and cash update and described changes to benchmark construction and implementation plans as the fund increases its allocation to income-generating assets.

Curt and Alo Martins of the investment team said the board-approved strategic asset allocation adopted last year established new targets that increase fixed-income exposure: an 8% target to Treasuries, a 12% target to public credit and a 1% target to cash. Combined with private-credit work, staff said the long-term goal is to reach roughly 31% in income-generating assets over time.

Alo Martins described the portfolio’s objectives — liquidity, income, diversification and capital preservation — and summarized markets in 2024. Staff noted material benchmark changes adopted last year: the public-fixed-income benchmark moved to a 50/50 blend of investment-grade corporate and high-yield indices, replacing the prior three-way benchmark that included a larger emerging-market component.

To implement the new benchmark and scale the allocation, staff said it created a public-credit risk framework with quantitative guardrails. The framework calibrated a target tracking error of about 150 basis points (with an allowable range of 100–200 bps), an assumed information ratio near 0.5 and a resulting long-run excess-return target of roughly 75 basis points. Staff also set allowable sector ranges that include a 30–60% range for on-benchmark sectors (investment-grade and high-yield corporate credit) and 0–20% ranges for off-benchmark buckets such as bank loans, CLOs, emerging-market debt and structured credit.

Staff said the portfolio is in compliance with the board’s asset-class allowable ranges and that the treasury sleeve is passively managed and tracking its index. The public-credit portfolio returned 6.7% for the year and outperformed its benchmark by about 110 basis points, while the treasury sleeve returned approximately 2.3% in line with its index. The new cash allocation—created mid‑year—returned about 2.9% since inception, staff said.

Commissioners asked about manager selection, the role of multi-sector managers and how CLOs (collateralized loan obligations) might be included. Staff said multi-sector managers may opportunistically access parts of the CLO market inside their guidelines and that the fund can, if desired, hire single-sector managers for structured-credit exposures provided the allocations fit the tracking-error and liquidity framework.

Staff recommended continuing a manager research agenda focused on investment-grade and high-yield strategies, refining mandates and potentially evaluating active approaches for part of the treasury allocation. The board did not take a vote; staff said it would return with implementation steps and manager recommendations.