Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Tax Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House Committee on Taxation advances package of tax bills and agrees to begin broader tax‑policy review

2611152 · March 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Kansas House Committee on Taxation on Tuesday advanced a series of bills — including sales‑tax changes for cable services, an income‑tax trigger, data‑center sales exemptions, movie‑production credits and a veterans property‑tax refund — and directed members to begin drafting guiding principles for future exemptions and credits.

The House Committee on Taxation advanced a set of tax bills and directed staff to begin drafting broader guidance for how exemptions and credits should be handled in the future.

The committee approved a mix of targeted and structural measures, voting to move forward measures that would: remove sales tax on certain cable and community antenna television services; create an automatic formula for future income‑tax rate reductions tied to state general fund growth; authorize time‑limited sales tax exemptions for qualifying data centers; establish a transferable film and digital media production credit program; and create a refundable property‑tax credit for certain permanently disabled veterans. Committee members also clarified the Board of Tax Appeals filing‑fee language so the absence of a fee would apply per parcel while an appeal remains pending.

The votes came amid repeated calls from members to address the larger set of exemptions and credits the panel considers each year. "We make individual decisions depending on who our friends are," Representative Helgerson said during a subcommittee report, adding that the panel should provide clearer guidance to future legislators. Helgerson offered to draft a broad proposal and present it for committee review, a step members agreed to pursue. "If you want a document like that ... I'll be happy to start working on it," he said.

Why it matters: Committee members said the frequent, case‑by‑case grants of exemptions and credits have created perceived inconsistencies and long‑term fiscal tradeoffs. Multiple members urged the committee to produce guiding principles to define when exemptions or credits are appropriate, how to evaluate their effectiveness, and whether some should include sunsets or reporting requirements.

Key actions and details

Votes at a glance — measures the committee voted to advance (vote tallies shown when recorded): - Senate Bill 269 (Board of Tax Appeals filing fee): committee adopted a conceptual amendment clarifying the exemption applies by parcel when a prior appeal remains pending; bill passed favorably as amended (voice vote). The amendment was described by staff as aligning language to the committee’s intent that a pending appeal on a parcel exempt a subsequent filing fee for that parcel while the earlier appeal remains unresolved.

- House Bill 2013 (remove sales tax on cable, community antenna and television services, as narrowed): Representative Francis offered an amendment narrowing the scope to cable subscription programming consistent with federal definitions; the committee approved the amendment and then passed HB 2013 favorably. Division vote recorded: 13 in favor, 9 opposed.

- House Bill 2387 (extend income tax credit for Friends of Cedar Crest; amendment to include Eisenhower Foundation): Representative Sanders’ amendment added the Eisenhower Foundation to the existing sunset extension for the Friends of Cedar Crest credit and the committee passed the bill as amended (voice vote). Staff said the amendment mirrors the earlier credit at issue and extended the credit through the tax years ending before Jan. 1, 2036 (sometimes referenced in discussion as the 2035 tax year).

- Senate Bill 227 (historic rehabilitation tax credit): committee approved an amendment disqualifying applicants with outstanding tax liabilities to the state or political subdivisions (sponsors said the bar is intended to prevent delinquent taxpayers from receiving credits). The bill passed favorably as amended (voice vote).

- House Bill 2318 (income tax trigger tied to state general fund growth): the bill would direct excess revenue growth above a base year, adjusted for inflation, to buy down individual income tax rates until a single 4.5% rate is reached, and then future decreases would apply to corporate/privilege taxes. Representative Hohisel’s amendment made the corporate privilege tax reductions correspond with the income‑tax buydowns; the committee passed the bill as amended. Division vote recorded: 15 in favor, 6 opposed. Members asked that several no votes be recorded by name during the tally.

- Senate Bill 51 (sales tax exemptions for qualified data centers): the committee approved a negotiated amendment that reduced the duration of exemptions at each investment tier (the sponsor said proponents proposed the adjustment). The bill, as amended, advances with tiered investment thresholds and reduced term lengths.

- House Bill 2005 (Veterans Valor Property Tax Relief Act): the bill establishes a refundable income tax credit equal to 75% of property taxes paid on a taxpayer’s principal residence for certain permanently and totally disabled veterans; an amendment by Representative Butler reduced the credit percentage to 50% (the amendment was adopted) and the committee passed the bill as amended. Staff supplied a fiscal estimate indicating multi‑million dollar annual costs if fully utilized.

- Senate Bill 52 (Kansas Film and Digital Media Production Development Act): the bill creates a film/digital media production tax credit and a limited sales tax exemption. Members debated sunset length; a motion to shorten the proposed sunset to five years failed on division. The committee ultimately passed SB 52 as amended; a recorded division showed the motion carried, 12 in favor and 9 opposed.

Other procedural and informational items

- RS 1708: Josh Brewer, executive director of Habitat for Humanity of the Northern Flint Hills, introduced RS 17‑08, described as "an amendment to 79,503A to recognize the restrictions on real estate in a community land trust." The committee approved the introduction with no objection.

- Sales‑tax exemption subcommittee report: Representative Helgerson and other members described multiple subcommittee meetings and proposed starting a formal effort to develop principles for exemptions and credits — possibly producing a draft for inter‑session or interim committee review. Several members recommended scorecards, sunsets on project‑specific exemptions, and clearer evaluation/metrics for economic development credits.

What committee members asked staff to do next

- Draft a guiding document or "blueprint" on tax exemptions and credits for committee review before the end of the session; sponsors indicated staff (and Representative Helgerson) would prepare a draft for committee consideration.

- Clarify statutory language in bills where staff noted possible ambiguities (for example, how an appeal is defined for the Board of Tax Appeals filing‑fee exemption).

Who spoke (selected) Josh Brewer, executive director, Habitat for Humanity of the Northern Flint Hills (introduced RS 17‑08). Representative Helgerson (subcommittee chair/sponsor; proposed drafting a broad policy document and offered the conceptual amendment on SB 269 language). Representative Sanders (committee member; asked clarifying questions on appeals language and voted on multiple measures). Representative Francis (sponsor of HB 2013 amendment narrowing cable exemption scope). Representative Hohisel (moved passage on multiple bills and offered amendment tying privilege tax to income tax buydowns on HB 2318). Representative Butler (sponsor of the veterans credit amendment reducing the credit percentage). Adam (reviser/staff) and Eddie (staff fiscal advisor) provided statutory summaries and fiscal estimates during the meeting.

Limitations and notes This article summarizes actions taken and key discussion points recorded in the committee transcript. Vote tallies are reported where the transcript records a division vote. Quotations are verbatim from speakers in the transcript. The committee did not provide a meeting date in the supplied transcript; dates and times are therefore not reported here.