Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy Fairtax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tennessee House adopts resolution urging Congress to consider national 'Fair Tax' consumption tax
Summary
The House adopted House Joint Resolution 17 urging Congress to repeal federal income taxes and consider HR 25, the Fair Tax Act, prompting floor debate over regressivity and production-stage tax elimination.
The Tennessee House adopted a nonbinding resolution urging the U.S. Congress to consider replacing federal income taxes with a national retail consumption tax commonly known as the "Fair Tax." Representative Powers moved adoption of House Joint Resolution 17, which endorses HR 25 (the Fair Tax Act) as a national retail sales tax while stating protections for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
Supporters described the Fair Tax as a national consumption tax that would eliminate federal income and payroll taxes and argued it would be fairer and simpler. Representative Powers said projections he had seen put an effective retail rate in the 17% to 23% range and described the proposal as in keeping with Tennessee’s consumption-tax model.
Opponents said the policy would be regressive and place a heavier burden on lower-income households. Representative McKenzie argued a national consumption tax would disproportionately affect working families and noted concerns about the impact on households already paying for housing, food, and transportation.
Representative Laffer and others defended the concept and said proponents propose rebates and that production-stage taxes would be removed under the plan, which supporters said could lower production costs. Floor debate included back-and-forth about whether rebates and elimination of production-stage taxes would compensate for regressivity.
The House adopted the resolution. The clerk announced the vote on the motion as "Aye, 69, 20 2 nays" as recorded in the chamber and the chair declared the resolution adopted. The resolution urges Congress to consider HR 25 but does not change federal law or create a state tax.
Because HJR 17 is a house joint resolution urging federal action, it has advisory effect only; supporters said it signals Tennessee’s preference to Congress, while opponents said the policy discussion belongs at the federal level and raised concerns about distributional effects.
