Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Funding And Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Division of Administration budget shows large federal and grant activity; members ask about broadband, Restore and capital funds
Summary
Senate fiscal staff and the Division of Administration briefed the committee on a budget driven by federal grants and disaster recovery programs, highlighting large other‑charges lines for CDBG/Restore, broadband and water‑sector funding and asking for details on program delivery and oversight.
Get email alerts on the Federal Funding And Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate fiscal staff reviewed the Division of Administration’s FY26 recommended budget and told the Senate Finance Committee that much of the agency’s dollar growth reflects federal recovery and block‑grant programs rather than general‑fund expansions.
Chaz Nichols of Senate Fiscal Services said the agency’s expenditures have risen since FY18 largely because the division administers large federal flows: CDBG mitigation and disaster recovery obligations, the Restore Louisiana allocations, broadband and water‑sector programs. He flagged several large line items in the DOA budget: the CDBG mitigation program (about $283.3 million), Restore Louisiana disaster recovery (about $708.9 million), and a broadband equity and deployment line (about $98.3 million) included in the division’s other‑charges category.
The division’s presentation also showed a $462 million number tied to previously approved BA‑7 actions for disaster recovery related to the 2020–21 events; Fiscal Services noted the current FY26 budget authority reflects timing and accounting conventions tied to those federal awards. Nichols said the division will continue to administer several federal streams while interagency transfers and statutory dedications support other programs.
Committee members raised operational questions. Senators asked about the broadband program (sometimes called “Gumbo” in the presentation) and how priorities and vendor performance are tracked. Senators also pressed the division about staff capacity: the agency budget includes additional positions to support water‑sector Phase 2 and capital‑outlay work, and Nichols said a recent increase in facility planning activity has driven an authorization for more staff.
Nichols and agency staff also walked senators through the DOA debt‑service unit (payments related to state facilities financing) and said trends reflect past capital financing and a handful of installment purchases now in repayment. The presentation noted other one‑time projects and acquisitions for legal counsel and professional services that DOA seeks to fund in support of its oversight role.
Why it matters: DOA is the fiscal manager for many federal and federally funded recovery programs; the size and timing of those awards affects cash flow, legislative oversight and when related capital projects move from planning to construction.
