Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes And Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Miami-Dade ad hoc committee approves agenda, procedural supplements and procurement amendments
Summary
The Government Efficiency & Transparency Ad Hoc Committee unanimously set its agenda, adopted supplements to an ordinance on board rules of procedure and approved two procurement-related amendments during its March 13, 2025 meeting.
The Miami-Dade County Government Efficiency & Transparency Ad Hoc Committee on March 13, 2025 unanimously approved its meeting agenda, adopted two supplements to an ordinance on the Board of County Commissioners’ rules of procedure and approved two amendments related to procurement practice and procurement implementing orders.
The committee voted first to set the meeting agenda. Commissioner Conehagen moved to set the agenda; Commissioner Reynoldado seconded. The motion carried unanimously.
The committee later moved, by voice vote, to bifurcate the agenda to take two specified items separately. Commissioner Regalado moved the bifurcation; there was a second and the motion passed unanimously.
A public hearing was opened for item 1G1, an ordinance to amend section 2-1 of the Code of Miami‑Dade County to allow electronic delivery of agenda materials to commissioners. No members of the public addressed the committee on the item. Commissioner Regalado moved approval of the ordinance; Commissioner Cohen Higgins seconded. A roll call recorded votes from the four members present—Commissioner Cohen Higgins, Commissioner Regalado, Vice Chairman Cabrera and Chairman Bermudez—and the motion passed unanimously.
The committee also adopted, without recorded opposition, two supplements to item 1G1: a fiscal impact statement and a social equity statement.
On amendments to procurement-related items, Commissioner Cohen Higgins moved to amend item 2B to update references within Implementing Order No. 3‑38 (the master procurement implementing order), aligning delegated authority thresholds for award and rejection of competitive contracts to specified code sections. Namata Uppal, identified in the meeting as the chief procurement officer, explained how contracts tracked in the county’s InForm system are overseen and how procurement staff notify departments when contracts approach expiration. Commissioner Cohen Higgins moved the amendment; Commissioner Regalado seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
For item 2C, the committee adopted an amendment—moved by Vice Chairman Cabrera and seconded by Commissioner Regalado—adding language that no terms that “materially alter the original RFP or the vendor’s original proposal” shall be negotiated into the final contract, with exceptions requiring written justification from the county mayor or the mayor’s designee. The amended motion passed unanimously.
All recorded votes during this meeting were unanimous among the four members present.
