Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Liquor Audits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would raise audit threshold for municipal liquor stores to $500,000; representatives cite cost pressure on small towns
Summary
Representative Anderson introduced House File 1956 to increase the revenue threshold requiring municipal liquor stores to submit audited financial statements from $350,000 to $500,000, citing inflation and rising audit costs for small towns; the committee laid the bill over.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Liquor Audits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Anderson brought House File 1956 to the committee on March 13, seeking to raise the audited financial-statement threshold for municipal liquor stores from $350,000 to $500,000.
Anderson said the $350,000 threshold was set in the early-to-mid 1990s and that adjusting it to $500,000 is "a cautious and acceptable adjustment" when accounting for inflation. He cited a State Auditor report that showed municipal liquor operations as important gathering places in Greater Minnesota and noted recent declines in net profits across the sector.
Mayor Simmons of De Graaf, a small Swift County town with a municipal liquor operation, was unable to connect by phone for technology reasons; Representative Anderson summarized the mayor's prepared comments to the committee. Anderson said the mayor told him the city's 2012 audit cost $12,000 and that a proposed audit for the next year was priced at $18,500 — a roughly 54% increase that the town found prohibitive.
Members expressed support for the intent to help smaller municipal operations offset compliance costs. Representative Bonner said he appreciated the bill as a measure to help small businesses and municipal enterprises. No committee vote was taken; Representative Anderson's bill was laid over for possible inclusion.
Ending: The committee laid HF1956 over so staff and legislators can continue to examine audit-cost impacts on small municipalities and consider whether to adjust the current statutory threshold.

