Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Structures Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning administrator approves 60-square-foot recreation structure near historic homes with condition limiting openings
Summary
The San Clemente zoning administrator approved a 60-square-foot accessory recreation structure at 123 West Escalanes, finding it complies with zoning and design guidelines and adding a condition prohibiting mechanical equipment and openings on walls facing side or rear property lines.
Zoning Administrator Adam Matamian approved a development permit on March 6, 2025, for a 60-square-foot accessory recreation structure at 123 West Escalanes, adopting Resolution ZA25-004 to approve Development Permit 24-606 with a modified condition of approval restricting mechanical equipment and openings on walls that face side and rear property lines.
Jessica Gattney, assistant planner, told the zoning administrator the single-story structure would provide recreational space and a full bathroom, use black thermal wood cladding and a metal standing-seam roof, and is under 450 square feet so it may encroach to the property lines under current code provisions for accessory structures. Gattney also noted the structure cannot be seen from the public right-of-way and therefore will not negatively affect two adjacent historic resources abutting the property.
During questions, staff and the applicant discussed the placement of a ductless split heat pump and a door that, as drawn, would sit within about a foot of the side-yard fence. Gattney said the applicant will need to reorient the heat pump and relocate a window so there are no openings within the narrow gap. Matamian proposed adding a condition (Condition 1.9) prohibiting mechanical equipment, doors, or windows on walls facing the side and rear property lines; he moved to adopt staff’s recommendation with that modification.
The applicant stated there is no intention to rent or occupy the structure as a dwelling unit. "There's no intentions to rent this unit. This is only for their use, and, there's no intention to live in it," the applicant said. Matamian reminded the record that converting the structure to habitable or rental use would require separate permits and compliance with additional standards.
With the added condition, Matamian adopted Resolution ZA25-004 approving Development Permit 24-606. The applicant must submit revised plans showing relocated mechanical equipment and no openings on the restricted walls before final plan-check and permit issuance.
