Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kansas House passes juvenile-justice changes increasing detention limits and placements
Summary
The Kansas House passed House Bill 23-29 to raise detention limits for juvenile offenders, expand placements in youth residential facilities and require the Department of Corrections to pay associated costs; opponents warned longer detention alone won’t solve youth needs.
The Kansas House of Representatives passed House Bill 23-29 by a vote of 106 to 16, advancing changes to the Kansas juvenile justice code that raise cumulative detention limits for juvenile offenders, increase penalties for juveniles who use firearms or are repeat offenders, and expand placement in non–foster-home youth residential facilities.
Supporters said the bill centralizes responsibility for certain placements and for associated costs. The measure requires the Secretary of Corrections to pay for costs of placement in youth residential facilities and authorizes the Kansas Juvenile Justice Oversight Committee to monitor the effects of such placements. It also permits the secretary to use evidence-based program account funds from the state general fund to contract for beds in youth residential facilities.
The bill’s sponsor described the changes as a response to the need for placement capacity and oversight; proponents included the committee on corrections and juvenile justice. The bill text as read on the floor references adjustments to detention limits and criminal penalties tied to firearm use and repeat offending.
Opponents urged caution. Representative Moseley, who recorded an explanation of his no vote, said longer detention and stricter penalties are not, by themselves, a solution. "Longer sentences and strict guidelines only put a bandage on a gaping chest wound," Moseley said on the floor, adding that many children reflect the circumstances of their environments and need hope and supporting services rather than an increase solely in incarceration.
The House clerk opened and closed the roll for the final vote. After members recorded their votes, the clerk announced that with 106 voting in favor and 16 against, the bill had received the constitutionally required majority and was declared passed.
What’s next: the bill, having passed the House, follows the legislative process toward consideration by the Senate and any conference procedures necessary for final enactment.
