Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Action Suspension topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baldwin-Whitehall board approves 15-day suspension for district employee; amendment adds a scrimmage and one game
Summary
The Baldwin-Whitehall School District Board of School Directors voted 8–0 (one absence) to approve a 15‑day suspension of a district employee, amended to specify that the suspension will include a scrimmage and one game. A senior baseball player urged the board to reconsider during public comment.
The Baldwin‑Whitehall School District Board of School Directors voted 8–0, with one member absent, to approve a 15‑day suspension for a district employee; the board amended the motion to specify the suspension will include a scrimmage and one scheduled game.
The motion to amend the recommended penalty—adding language to cover both a scrimmage and one game—was moved and seconded at the meeting and passed on a roll‑call vote before the board approved the amended suspension. The board president announced the final result as an 8–0 vote with one member absent.
The suspension drew a public comment from a Baldwin High School senior, Brady Kaplan, who addressed the board about the impact on student participants. “Coach Wolf has already had a massive impact on our program,” Kaplan said, asking the board to reconsider the length of the restriction because players had missed practices and early season games.
Board members discussed the amendment prior to the vote. One member said the board had “weighed this very heavily” and noted concern about not punishing students for an adult’s conduct while acknowledging the seriousness of the situation. The board clarified that if a suspended game is postponed (for example for weather), the suspension will move to the next scheduled contest.
The board handled the suspension as an individual personnel matter during the public business meeting; the personnel action was recorded in the meeting minutes and passed by the stated roll‑call tally.
No further details about the allegations that led to the suspension, the district employee’s identity, or any investigatory findings were provided in the public portion of the transcript. The district stated the action as a personnel decision and followed with routine agenda items.
