Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commission Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PROS selects new chair and vice chair; approves private tree removals and other permit actions
Summary
At its March meeting the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission elected a new chair and vice chair, approved several private tree‑removal permits with replacement conditions, and adopted staff recommendations on other tree matters. Most motions passed unanimously; one removal permit passed with a dissenting vote.
The Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission held reorganization and permit votes during its March meeting, electing a chair and vice chair and acting on a series of tree‑removal requests and related recommendations.
Elections The commission conducted its annual reorganization. Commissioners elected Yvette Izetta as chair and Jeffrey Rausch as vice chair; both elections carried by unanimous roll call.
Tree‑removal permits and related actions The commission heard multiple staff reports and voted on private tree‑removal permits and replacement conditions.
- 849 Second Street West (planting strip liquid amber): Staff recommended removal because large surface roots had lifted the walkway and encroached on a nearby high‑voltage box. The commission voted to approve the removal and require a replacement tree (vote recorded as unanimous).
- 19172 Robinson Road: Staff recommended denial of immediate removal and instead proposed root‑pruning inspection concurrent with planned driveway reconstruction; if an on‑site root inspection determines extensive root damage that cannot be mitigated, the tree would be approved for removal and a replacement required. After public testimony from the property owners citing repeated sewer and water‑line problems, the commission approved the removal permit for the Robinson Road property. The motion passed with a recorded 4–1 result; Commissioner Tolbert voted no.
- 537 Estimadera Drive: Staff recommended removal of a blue atlas cedar causing cracking of adjacent hardscape and potential future foundation damage; the commission approved the removal and required a replacement tree. Commissioners noted the tree was effectively a double‑trunk specimen and that replacements should follow established guidance (historically a 1:1 replacement with 24‑inch‑box stock has been used). The vote passed (roll call showed a majority in favor).
Other votes The commission also unanimously approved a consent calendar of routine items earlier in the meeting and voted unanimously to adopt the city arborist’s recommendations for Depot Park trees on city property while the county proceeds on county parcels (see separate coverage).
Why it matters: These votes set near‑term outcomes for private properties, public safety (sidewalk and field hazards), and municipal tree‑canopy replacement expectations. Several motions included explicit replacement requirements; commissioners discussed larger stock (48‑inch box) for some mitigation plantings and asked staff to report back on cost and logistics.
Records and next steps Motions passed and failed as recorded at the meeting. Staff indicated that details about replacement sizes, monetary in‑lieu options, and any cost‑share agreements with the county will be returned to the commission for follow‑up.
