Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves zoning change to allow cat adoptions in downtown B-1 district
Summary
Commissioners voted unanimously to forward an amendment to the zoning ordinance that adds a by-right allowance for cat adoptions in the B-1 Central Business District and clarifies definitions for pet adoption and pet shops; the change also adds pet-adoption allowance to B-2.
The Harrisonburg Planning Commission on March 12 voted unanimously to forward a zoning-ordinance amendment to city council that would allow pet adoptions (limited to cats by this proposal) as a by-right use in the B-1 Central Business District and add pet adoption to the B-2 General Business District.
Staff explained the draft amendment adds two definitions: “pet adoption,” defined as the transfer of ownership of a companion animal from a releasing agency to an individual where the transfer is not a sale or barter for profit, and a clarified definition of “pet shop” as a retail establishment where companion animals are bought, sold, or offered to the public. The proposed change would allow nonprofit adoption activity for cats to occur in downtown locations where Cat’s Cradle and other groups keep animals visible in storefront windows but currently cannot complete adoptions on-site.
Sherry Heichman, executive director of Cat’s Cradle, told commissioners the organization completes about 600 adoptions per year through local PetSmart and that the current practice requires volunteers to transport animals off-site for transfers. “We would love the opportunity to have that happen right there in our locality that we’re in now,” Heichman said, noting Cat’s Cradle is regulated by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and maintains isolation and care protocols.
Staff noted the amendment limits the by-right B-1 adoption authority to cats because the commission had received the specific request for cat adoptions and because dogs and other animals can create distinct operational impacts (noise, exercise) that staff had not yet evaluated. Commissioners discussed past enforcement, how cat cafes could benefit, and whether the change might unintentionally create confusion with pet shops in code; staff said the revisions define terms to avoid that confusion. The commission voted unanimously to forward the amendment to city council with a favorable recommendation.
