Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves broad Medicaid technical bill after extended debate on costs and services
Summary
The Mississippi House passed the Medicaid technical package (Senate Bill 22,867) after debate over program costs and which optional services the state is obligated to cover. The bill includes provider payment changes, appeals provisions and a two‑year supplemental payment extension for LeBonheur Children’s Hospital in Memphis.
The Mississippi House voted to pass Senate Bill 22,867, a wide-ranging Medicaid technical bill, on a roll call of 105 yeas to 6 nays. The measure, taken up during the general calendar, contains numerous adjustments to reimbursement rates, coverage rules and administrative procedures for the Division of Medicaid.
The bill’s sponsor and supporters said the measure consolidates previously approved provisions and adds targeted changes requested by the Division of Medicaid to secure federal approval. The sponsor described the measure as a "Medicaid tech bill" and told members it does not include Medicaid expansion or new eligibility categories.
Lawmakers and committee chairs noted the bill reimburses pediatricians at 100% of the Medicare rate, shortens the interval for covering eyeglasses for children from five years to two years, increases ambulatory surgery reimbursement from 80% to 90% of Medicare, and authorizes payments for certain non‑statin/non‑opioid therapies. The measure also restores internal appeals at the Division of Medicaid and preserves a provider appeals route through Chancery Court in Hinds County.
A provision drew particular attention: the bill reinstates LeBonheur Children’s Hospital in Memphis in the state supplemental payment system for two years while a permanent solution is sought. Supporters said that temporary measure is a primary driver of cost in the bill.
During extended questioning on the floor, members raised concern about fiscal impacts if federal funding were reduced. One member asked the sponsor how the state would respond if large federal Medicaid cuts materialize; the sponsor said the specifics of such reductions are speculative and that legislators would have to address them when known. Members also discussed which services are federally required versus optional under Medicaid law and noted that pharmaceuticals and some long-term services can be considered optional, which affects priority setting under constrained funding.
The House adopted the measure after voting to adopt earlier amendments and the final passage motion. The sponsor emphasized that previously passed appropriations would fund the Division but acknowledged the bill increases state cost in limited areas tied mainly to provider payments and the temporary LeBonheur supplement.
Supporters argued the bill clarifies program operations and brings the state into better federal compliance; critics cautioned that optional services could be placed at risk if the federal funding picture changes materially.
The bill was recorded as final passage by a vote of 105 yeas, 6 nays.
