Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senate committee reviews HB 147, agrees to craft substitute to inventory state AI systems and consider SB 37 elements

2578400 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Georgia Senate committee heard authors and agency officials on House Bill 147, agreeing to draft a substitute that would require an annual inventory of government AI systems, clarify definitions and scope, and consider elements of Senate Bill 37 including a proposed advisory board and guidance for local governments. No formal vote was taken.

A Georgia Senate committee met to discuss House Bill 147, which would require an annual inventory of artificial intelligence systems used by state agencies, and agreed to work with the bill’s author and other senators to draft a substitute before taking action.

The committee chair opened the session saying “we've got before us, House Bill 147 by Representative Thomas,” and framed the meeting as a working discussion to collect questions and items for a substitute version. Representative Thomas, the bill’s author, told the panel the bill’s “posture today” is to have discussion around HB 147 and collect items the committee wants included or removed.

Why it matters: committee members and outside witnesses said the measure would create transparency about where AI is used in state government and establish guardrails for systems that influence official decisions. Several senators also raised whether the bill should be expanded to cover local governments and constitutional officers, and whether a new statewide advisory board or the Georgia Technology Authority (GTA) should lead implementation.

Key points from the discussion

- Inventory and scope: HB 147 (LC560266) directs an annual inventory of systems that “employ artificial intelligence” in use by an agency, beginning on a date cited in the draft. Committee members pressed the author on whether the inventory should cover only systems that make or materially support decisions (decision-driving systems) or include lower‑risk tools such as predictive text and Copilot-style…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans