Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee delays Crutchfield TIF amendment after staff and developer revise boundaries and financing
Summary
City staff and the developer reported changes to the Crutchfield District tax-increment financing plan, expanding the project-area benefits and increasing the projected increment from roughly $4 million to roughly $40 million; staff said a corrected resolution will return to council on March 26.
City staff and the developer told the Urban and Economic Development Committee on March 12 that they have revised the Crutchfield District tax-increment financing (TIF) project plan and will return with corrected resolution language at a later council meeting.
Aaron Kearsley, staff lead on the project, said negotiations with the developer, Stewart McDaniel, produced a larger area of benefit. "We have extended the project area... so actually, what we can do now is he can actually spend some of the increment in areas further down... which I think is a very, encouraging process," Kearsley said. Stewart McDaniel confirmed the change and the practical effect, explaining the expansion allows spillover investment toward the Archer corridor and down to Lewis while excluding parcels east of Utica from contributing to the increment.
Kearsley told councilors the estimated TIF increment changed materially: "it would move from 4,000,000 to 40,000,000 and some change," and staff said they had corrected a legal description and several typographical errors before returning the item to the council docket. The committee discussed timing and procedure; staff and the developer agreed to return the corrected resolution to the March 26 council agenda rather than seek immediate action.
Councilor Dr. Wright said the proposal represents an uncommon use of TIF in Tulsa — deploying increment to support housing and mixed-income projects in addition to commercial development — and commended staff for pausing to get the legal descriptions and boundaries right. Committee members asked about subareas (labeled B, C, D, E and F in staff materials) and whether specific parcels had active developers; staff said some subareas are single-site developments while others are held for future activation and that the TIF term would be about 25 years.
Why it matters: Staff characterized the Crutchfield amendment as a proof of concept for broader use of TIF dollars — including housing, public improvements, and spillover benefits into adjacent blocks — and said accurate legal descriptions and maps are required before final council approval.
What happens next: Staff will return a corrected resolution and map to the City Council on March 26 for further consideration; no committee vote was taken at the March 12 meeting.
