Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners open review of Chinsengate Hill lease after public concerns about planned improvements
Summary
The board paused action and directed staff to return in May with lease modification options after public speakers urged preservation and asked that tree removal and archaeological risks be examined before paving and restroom work proceed.
Hernando County commissioners heard hours of public comment March 11 on Chinsengate Hill, a state-owned historic property the county currently manages under a lease, and directed staff to return with at least three lease-modification options for the board to consider during the budget cycle.
The meeting drew residents, history and preservation professionals, descendants of long-time local families, and representatives from the Tampa Bay History Center who described recent preservation, programming and museum work at the site. Speakers praised the site’s history and said it has strong potential as a heritage destination. Gulf Archaeology Research Institute director Gary Ellis urged a thorough archaeological study and said the property may be a strong candidate for higher-level historic designation.
Several residents and local preservation advocates raised concerns that recent tree removal and proposed paving and restroom placement near the dining hall may affect historically significant landscape features and subsurface archaeological deposits. "Please stop cutting down trees and bushes that have been there for over a hundred years," volunteer docent Amber Lamoreaux said, urging consultation with archaeological specialists before ground-disturbing work begins.
County staff and the county attorney answered questions about the lease and permitting requirements. County attorney John Jobin noted the federal historic-site boundary covers a smaller core area (the manor house square) than the larger landscape often discussed by the public; he also quoted lease language that allows the lessee to make repairs required by code, the Americans with Disabilities Act or health regulations when necessary to keep facilities usable.
Commissioner Alaco proposed the board seek three options for changes to the county lease or assignment possibilities, including removing the retreat center portion of the county's responsibility or transferring some duties to another entity. Commissioner Loco moved that staff return to the board in May with at least three potential lease-modification options; the board approved the directive and asked staff to also examine funding alternatives, the scope of historic boundaries, tree-removal justification and archaeological-sensitivity studies.
Staff and the county administrator said the county has been managing the site since a nonprofit dissolved and that the county has funded capital work (air conditioning, roofing, road millings, water line work) to stabilize structures and permit public use. The board asked staff to provide clearer cost accounting for recent work (the current budget included about $892,000 in allocations and several projects in the capital plan) and to explore whether state, tourism or other funding sources could reduce general-fund pressure.
No board vote was taken to end or alter the lease at the meeting; instead the board requested staff return in May with options for the board’s review before the budget is finalized and encouraged continued community involvement in any design and stewardship plans.
