Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Preservation consultants identify about 4,000 properties 50+ years old; recommend phased survey and grants
Summary
Consultants from Clinton Brown Company presented a townwide historic resources survey for Grand Island, reporting roughly 4,000 properties that meet a 50‑year threshold and recommending targeted surveys, National Register nominations where appropriate, and pursuit of state grant programs to fund phased work.
Clinton Brown of Brown Company Architecture told the Grand Island Town Board that a townwide historic resource survey identified approximately 4,000 extant properties with construction dates of 50 years or older and recommended a phased approach to surveying, designation and grant applications.
Brown said the study frames the island’s development around its bridges, which greatly increased access and spurred residential and commercial growth, and identified dense collections of mid‑century and earlier houses that could form historic districts. He told the board that a state historic homeownership tax credit and federal/state incentives for commercial property rehabilitation can make designation an economic driver for homeowner investment.
The consultants highlighted two large residential concentrations — Sandy Beach and Grand Island Village — and several individually notable properties, including an early 19th‑century smokehouse and locally important houses tied to the island’s settlement. Brown described the standard used in the survey: buildings, sites or structures 50 years or older were treated as potential historic resources in line with guidance from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the National Park Service.
Brown outlined next steps: reconnaissance‑level surveys of prioritized neighborhoods, coordination with the town and the advisory board, and application for grant support (for example, programs administered by the Preservation League of New York State). He said a typical grant match of roughly 20% would be expected and that the town would apply for the grants while contracting the consultants to perform the work if awarded.
Board members asked procedural questions about local designations and concerns homeowners sometimes raise about restrictions. Brown and his colleagues clarified that National Register listing alone does not impose controls on private owners’ actions; extra review and local controls occur only if the municipality adopts a local historic overlay or local designation that carries regulatory review. He also explained that state and National Park Service review is part of the listing process and that property owners within a proposed district receive notice and an opportunity to comment.
Consultants offered to answer follow‑up questions by email and to assist with grant applications and reconnaissance surveys if the town chooses to proceed.
