Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homelessness Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spokane County call for homeless‑services projects: Spokane Valley members outline recommendations, ask county to weigh final awards
Summary
City staff and Spokane Valley members of the county advisory committee briefed the council on a county call for homeless‑services proposals and different local recommendations for outreach, prevention, shelter and rehousing funds.
Gloria Mance (city services administrator) and Eric Robison (homeless and housing coordinator) briefed the council on Spokane County’s “call for projects” (part 2) and the Housing & Community Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC) review of homeless-services applications. The county split review of many applications into two parts because of the volume; the county’s board of commissioners will make final award decisions in April.
City staff described 32 applications across five intervention categories: outreach, homelessness prevention, emergency shelter (short-term), transitional housing and rapid rehousing. Key Spokane Valley‑related items included a city request for roughly $463,000 to extend and expand street outreach (the county’s initial available amount for that category was shown as $425,000 in staff materials), invitations to fund rural outreach programs, and multiple applications from organizations serving youth, women, veterans and single adults.
Mance and Robison emphasized that the total pool of funds is limited and that many good proposals compete for the same dollars. Committee members from Spokane Valley (Mance, Deputy Mayor Hatenberg and Councilmember Wick) made differing recommendations in some categories: for example, one local member recommended funding the city’s full outreach request while another recommended a smaller award so the county’s rural and youth programs could be funded. Mance said the committee had some flexibility to move dollars among categories when the county’s staff presented recommendations to the board.
Councilmembers raised concerns about past performance flags on a few applications and pressed for clarity on metrics, cost per client and whether awards would be reallocated if federal funding levels changed. Staff reiterated that award decisions are the county’s, but staff will return to the council after the county board acts and will provide details on recommended awards and any council‑level implications.
Next steps: County HCDAC will complete recommendations and present them to the Spokane County Board of Commissioners in April. After the county makes final awards, city staff will report back to council on how Spokane Valley applicants fared and any follow-up actions.
