Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Tax Collections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Law firm reports Bastrop ISD tax collections above TEA thresholds; roughly $4.36 million outstanding includes deferrals and active lawsuits

4261584 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Noe Reyes of McClary Vasilka Bragg & Allen told the Bastrop ISD board the district’s adjusted 2023 tax levy was $82,616,816 and that collection percentages meet Texas Education Agency expectations; he reported $1,849,000 of the 2023 levy remained unpaid as of March 31, 2025 and a total outstanding across many years of $4,357,000.

Noe Reyes of McClary Vasilka Bragg & Allen presented the district’s annual delinquent tax report, explaining the tax calendar, collection process and current collection rates. Reyes said the adjusted 2023 tax levy for Bastrop ISD was $82,616,816 and that “a little bit over 95% of those…were paid prior to July 1.” He said the district’s total revenue from tax collections for fiscal year 2024 was $83,180,616, including penalties and interest.

Reyes told the board that under Texas Education Agency guidance districts should target collection percentages around 95%. Citing recent figures, he said Bastrop ISD’s collections percentages have been above 95% and often exceed 100% when penalties and interest are included.

Reyes broke out delinquency numbers for recent years: for the 2023 tax year $3,926,000 was unpaid on July 1 and, as of March 31, 2025, the law firm had collected about $2,000,000 of that amount and $1,849,000 remained; that collection pace (roughly 53% collected within the first nine months) is within expected ranges, he said. For older levies he reported similarly high cumulative collection percentages (for example, more than 91% collected for 2020 after several years).

Reyes also reported a total outstanding unpaid balance across tax years of $4,357,000. He explained that taxable deferrals for qualifying homeowners (such as age-65 or disability deferrals) account for roughly $963,000 of that total and cannot be collected under statute. About 32% of the outstanding balance is in delinquent tax lawsuits or judgments and about 22% is on formal payment plans; an additional roughly 22% is in other categories the firm is actively working.

The presentation included an explanation of causes for long-standing unpaid balances, including tax-deferral statute limits, complex heirship issues that slow foreclosure and judicial collection processes, and the district’s typical practice of turning unpaid accounts over to the law firm after July 1 for collection efforts.

Board members asked questions about how penalties and interest are handled (Reyes said penalties are added and the law firm’s contingent fee is collected from delinquent taxpayers; the district receives the full underlying tax principal). Members also asked about timing and likelihood of future collection; Reyes estimated another roughly $1,000,000 of the 2023 delinquent balance would likely be collected within 12 months and that the first-year collection goal is about 50–60% of amounts turned over for collections.

No formal board action was recorded; the item was presented as the district’s annual delinquent tax report.