Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Miami Code Enforcement Board adjudicates mural, liens and permit cases; fines, mitigations and compliance deadlines set

3789647 · June 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a City of Miami Code Enforcement Board hearing, the board heard dozens of cases ranging from unauthorized murals to outstanding liens, approving settlements, mitigations and timelines for compliance including fines and per-diem penalties where violations continue.

The City of Miami Code Enforcement Board on the evening heard a long docket of cases involving unauthorized murals and signs, outstanding enforcement liens, building work without permits and certificate-of-use/business-tax-receipt (CU/BTR) issues. The board issued adjudications, approved mitigations or set compliance deadlines in multiple matters, and approved a multi-property settlement.

Why it matters: The board enforces city codes that can result in daily fines, liens on property and mitigation agreements that affect property transfers and business operations. Several actions at the hearing resolved long-running lien disputes and clarified timeframes for property owners to obtain permits or remove prohibited uses.

Key outcomes

- Mural at 2401 North Miami Avenue (Case 126163): The board found the matter guilty and imposed a $500 fine for repeated mural/advertising postings on the building façade. A vote on a $1,000 irreparable-harm fine earlier failed; a subsequent motion for $500 passed. Vote calls recorded in the transcript show mixed board support before the $500 motion passed.

- Multi-property settlement (5310 SW 7th Street and related cases): The city presented a proposed settlement totaling $80,000 to resolve accrued liens across multiple files (one itemized amount was $5,250). The board moved to approve the settlement as presented to allow closing of related litigation.

- Lien mitigations and settlements: The board approved several mitigation requests at reduced amounts or with conditions: • 4400 NE Second Avenue (CE2015009042): mitigation to the board-recommended minimum of $15,000 was approved. • 3151 NW 14th Street (Case 14951): the board approved mitigation to $0 provided the outstanding $10,000 irreparable-harm amount plus interest is paid directly from the seller’s/attorney’s escrow account (attorney identified as Carlos Marin/affiliate closings in the record). The board’s motion explicitly conditioned the mitigation on receipt of the $10,000 plus interest from escrow before the mitigation becomes effective. • 3558 Charles Avenue (Case 49353): mitigation to the minimum of $7,500 was approved. • 6151 SW 8th Street (Case 66377): mitigation to $15,000 for a commercial property lien was approved.

- Work without permit / CU/BTR compliance and time to cure: The board set compliance periods for multiple work-without-permit and CU/BTR matters, typically granting 30 to 180 days for owners to obtain permits or finish corrective work and imposing $250 per day (or other per-diem amounts when stated) after the deadline if the violation remains: • 1172 NW 20th Street (Case 100894): adjudicated guilty; 120 days to comply, $250/day thereafter. • 827 SW Eighth Street (Case 99430): adjudicated guilty; 90 days to comply, $250/day thereafter. • 737 NW 301st (Case 110897): guilty; 30 days, $250/day. • 50 NW 20 Fourth St., Unit 107 (Case 121582): guilty; 180 days, $250/day (outdoor seating/awnings work in progress). • Multiple other commercial and residential properties on the agenda were given 3–120 days depending on the scope, with standard $250/day penalties unless the board recorded a different per-diem.

Board procedure, notices and evidence

City staff and inspectors presented composite exhibits in each matter (notice of violation, certified mail returns, property-appraiser records and photographs). The board repeatedly confirmed notice was mailed and posted where required. Owner representatives, contractors and attorneys spoke in many cases; some matters were handled in absentia.

Quotes and attribution

• "This is not one of [the city's approved murals] nor is it approved," Inspector (record) said describing advertising painted on a building façade in the 2401 North Miami Avenue case.

• Senior Assistant City Attorney Diana Rasco presented the multi-property settlement and the allocation of the $80,000 total mitigation to resolve liens in several cases.

What to expect next

Owners who are given time to comply were reminded to request extensions online before deadlines if needed (miamigov.com → "extension of time"). Orders from the board will be recorded and, if fines remain unpaid, may become liens against property.

Votes at a glance (selected docket items)

- Case 126163 — 2401 North Miami Avenue: Adjudication of guilt; $500 fine (motion passed after prior motions failed). Vote record in transcript shows a split board before final motion passed. - Case 3381 and related files — 5310 SW 7th St. and others: Board approved settlement/mitigation structure totaling $80,000 as presented by City attorney. - CE2015009042 — 4400 NE Second Avenue: Mitigation approved at $15,000 (city recommendation). - Case 14951 — 3151 NW 14th Street: Mitigation approved to $0 conditioned on payment of $10,000 + interest from escrow to City prior to effectiveness. - Case 49353 — 3558 Charles Avenue: Mitigation approved at $7,500. - Case 66377 — 6151 SW 8th Street: Mitigation approved at $15,000. - Case 100894 — 1172 NW 20th St.: Guilty; 120 days to comply; $250/day thereafter. - Case 99430 — 827 SW Eighth St.: Guilty; 90 days to comply; $250/day thereafter. - Case 110897 — 737 NW 301st (power of attorney): Guilty; 30 days; $250/day thereafter. - Case 121582 — 50 NW 20 Fourth St., Unit 107: Guilty; 180 days; $250/day thereafter.

Ending

The board completed the docket and adjourned after issuing orders and setting deadlines. Owners, attorneys or contractors with unresolved items were told to work with code inspectors and the building-permits office and to follow the posted instruction sheet if they need to apply for an extension of time.