Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Prequalification topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Wausau meeting approves prequalified bidders for two infrastructure projects; DPW door contract deferred

3639986 · June 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Participants at a meeting in Wausau approved prequalification lists for the Metro Bridal drain replacement and Riverside Rail Corridor soil disposal projects by voice vote and agreed to delay action on a Department of Public Works overhead door replacement contract for a couple of weeks.

At a meeting in Wausau, participants approved prequalification lists for two infrastructure projects and postponed formal action on a Department of Public Works overhead door replacement contract.

The meeting record shows a motion to approve prequalified bidders for the Metro Bridal drain replacement project; the firms listed were Pembroke Companies, PGA Incorporated and Vinton Construction. That motion was seconded and approved by voice vote; the transcript records “Aye” but does not include a roll-call or numerical tally.

For the Riverside Rail Corridor soil disposal project, participants approved a longer list of prequalified bidders. The companies named in the transcript were Bay West LLC; Earth Incorporated; Hossons Incorporated; Integrity Grading and Incorporated; Yankee General Contractors; PGA Incorporated; Rearview Construction Incorporated; RLP Diversified Incorporated; Vinton Construction Company; and Waller Excavating. That motion was seconded and approved by voice vote with the transcript recording “Aye.” The record does not show individual vote tallies.

On the Department of Public Works overhead door replacement contract, the speaker indicated the current contract will likely be extended for a couple of weeks and that prequalifications for that project will be revisited at a later meeting. The transcript records this as a statement of intent rather than a formal vote.

The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn, which was seconded and approved by voice vote. The transcript records only voice responses and contains no named movers, seconders, or roll-call vote counts.

The transcript does not identify individual speakers by name or title for the motions or seconds, and it does not record vote tallies beyond the collective “Aye.”