Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes Economy Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dorchester County council approves multiple economic development and zoning measures; several first readings advanced
Summary
At its June 2 meeting, Dorchester County Council and the Planning, Development & Building Committee approved rezonings, extended development agreements and advanced several fee‑in‑lieu and inducement matters. Council also approved changes to hospitality tax timing and right‑of‑way transfers.
Dorchester County's Planning, Development & Building Committee and full County Council on June 2 approved a slate of zoning, economic development and administrative actions; most votes were unanimous.
Key committee and council actions (votes at a glance):
- Rezoning request 931 (Wanda Lenore): The committee recommended and the council accepted second‑reading approval to rezone a 1.7‑acre parcel off 1636 Central Avenue (TMS 135‑16‑00‑002) from Office and Institutional (OI) to General Commercial (CG). Planning Commission had recommended approval. Vote: unanimous at committee and on council committee report (3‑0 at committee; council recorded unanimous approval of committee recommendation).
- Official map amendment 25‑01 (county‑initiated rezoning): The committee recommended and council accepted rezoning of multiple parcels in the northern county from Agricultural Residential (AR) to Industrial (I) or Commercial Light Industrial (CLI) to make existing industrial and light‑industrial businesses conforming. Planning staff said the change removes nonconforming status that would otherwise constrain future expansion. Public comment included a question about tax status; county staff said the parcels are currently used for industrial/light industrial and are not receiving agricultural tax treatment. Vote: unanimous (3‑0 committee; committee recommendation adopted by council).
- Hospitality tax code amendment (second reading): Council gave second reading to an ordinance amending chapter 20, article 5 (hospitality tax), to require the county to adopt an annual budget for hospitality tax distributions on a fiscal‑year basis. Council said aligning hospitality tax budgeting with the county budget enables use of the funds as bonding backstop in some projects. Vote: unanimous (second reading approved).
- Road right‑of‑way transfers: Council approved transfers of right‑of‑way from SCDOT to Dorchester County for West Fourth North Street (S‑181806) between North Main and North Cedar and for S‑1834 across the HSB parking lot (Summerville primary entrance). Vote: unanimous.
- Oak Ridge Landfill development agreement: Council held required public hearings and approved an ordinance extending the term of the existing development agreement (first amendment) by 10 years. Vote: unanimous (third reading adopted).
- Resenac Graphite America Inc. (formerly identified as Project Ark): Council held the public hearing and adopted third reading of a fee‑in‑lieu‑of‑tax (FILOT) ordinance authorizing a FILOT agreement under Chapter 44, Title 12, South Carolina Code of Laws. Vote: unanimous (third reading adopted).
- RW Ashley Phosphate Owner LLC (inducement and FILOT steps): Council adopted an inducement resolution for RW Ashley Phosphate Owner LLC and gave first readings to an associated FILOT ordinance and an amendment to the county's multi‑county park agreement with Orangeburg County, adding the company's property. Votes: inducement resolution adopted (unanimous); first readings approved (unanimous).
- STTOP LLP / Z LLC fee agreement extension: Council adopted a resolution extending the fee term under an earlier (12/05/2020) fee agreement by 10 years. Vote: unanimous.
- Post‑executive session authorization: After an executive session on economic development and a proposed cost‑sharing agreement, council authorized the county administrator to execute an amended and restated cost‑sharing agreement between Dorchester County and South Coast DFH Charleston LLC for water system improvements. Motion carried unanimously; a council member noted the original public motion did not include TMS numbers and they were clarified in follow‑up.
Why it matters: The group of actions advances county priorities to make existing industrial uses conforming, provide incentives and contractual terms to attract or retain industry, and align fiscal procedures for hospitality tax and capital planning. Several economic development actions (FILOTs, inducement resolution, multi‑county park amendment) are part of larger projects that anticipate local investment and state incentives.
Votes and procedure notes: Committee recommendations were read into the council minutes and adopted by the council; most votes were unanimous. Planning Commission recommended approval of the Wanda Lenore rezoning. Public hearings required for FILOT and development agreement amendments were held before final readings where required.
Ending: Several items were at first reading only and will return for later votes; the council closed the meeting after adopting the cost‑sharing authorization and adjourned.
