Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House Natural Resources panel hears bill to redefine Puerto Rico—s maritime-terrestrial zone

3588747 · May 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Commission on Natural Resources held a public hearing May 19 on Project of the House 25, which would amend statutory definitions of the zona mar—dtimo terrestre in two Puerto Rico laws. Agency witnesses and surveyors urged technical clarifications on tide datums, exceptions for cliffs and statutory alignment with existing regulations.

The House Commission on Natural Resources held a public hearing May 19 on Project of the House 25, a proposal to amend statutory definitions of Puerto Rico—s zona mar—dtimo terrestre in Law 151 (June 28, 1968) and Law 1 (June 29, 1977) as cited in the measure.

The measure would alter how the coastal "maritime-terrestrial zone" is defined for purposes of permits, servitudes and management of the public maritime-terrestrial domain. Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales, DRNA) officials, the state surveyor and the Association of Surveyors of Puerto Rico testified and recommended technical and drafting changes.

DRNA assistant secretary Eguilveliz Espinoza Lugo and staff described the agency—s statutory responsibilities for the maritime-terrestrial domain and said the draft bill generally moves toward legal clarity but needs technical corrections. "Respetuosamente sugerimos que se añada como —altima oraci—3n en las —1reas del archipi—9lago de Puerto Rico donde se encuentran acantilados si los acantilados tienen una elevaci—3n mayor o superior a la marejada no cicl—3nica en ese caso la servidumbre no es aplicable," Espinoza Lugo said, urging that high cliffs be excluded from the servitude. She also recommended clarifying whether the bill relies on the equinoctial tide and specified that wave run-up after a wave breaks should be excluded from the horizontal displacement…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans