Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alfalfa County staff discuss solid-waste requests and local cooperative agreement with district office
Summary
County staff discussed routing solid-waste requests to specific commissioner districts and preparing a resolution for a local cooperative agreement with Central Federal and Highway Division, District 3; staff also noted scheduling for a meeting of three local fire departments and routine agenda supplements.
Alfalfa County staff discussed routing solid-waste requests to specific commissioner districts and preparing language for a resolution to approve a local cooperative agreement with Central Federal and Highway Division, District 3 during routine agenda preparation.
The matter arose during administrative review when one staff member said, “Solid waste request going to district 1 and 3. I’ll make it mostly acceptable. I’ll just say Central Federal and Highway Division, District 3. Resolution approving in a local cooperative agreement.” Another staff member confirmed that the item was scanned and suggested omitting a district designation if the agreement should be available for broader use: “They asked not to put a district on that, so I didn’t put a district on that so that anybody else wants to use it.”
Staff also discussed several routine packet and agenda items. They asked a colleague to retrieve five supplemental documents for the meeting packet and noted changes needed to label one item as “interim.” One participant raised the question of posting an agenda for a meeting among three fire departments; staff said they would post the agenda but did not provide further scheduling details.
No formal motion, vote, or final approval of the cooperative agreement or the solid-waste routing appears in the transcript excerpts provided. The discussion as recorded focused on how to draft and label the agenda items and whether to attach a district designation to the cooperative agreement so that other jurisdictions could use it.
The exchange included a few additional administrative remarks about signing and distribution of documents, and attendees referenced names for routing and distribution (“Mike, Skyley, Fox,” and “Jeremy”) without attribution to formal roles in the excerpt.
If the county intends to place the cooperative agreement or solid-waste item on a future agenda for formal action, the record provided here does not include a motion, second, or vote.
