Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure And Parcel Map topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission continues Morgan Enterprises parcel map amid sewer, water and fire‑protection questions

2571754 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Tulare County Planning Commission continued consideration of tentative parcel map PPM24‑051, a proposed commercial subdivision at Lovers Lane and Caldwell, after debate over sewer access, septic rules and fire‑protection water supply.

The Tulare County Planning Commission continued consideration of tentative parcel map PPM24‑051, a proposed commercial subdivision by Morgan Enterprises at the southeast corner of Lovers Lane and Caldwell, after extended discussion about sewer availability, septic‑system rules and fire‑protection water supplies. The commission set a date‑certain continuance to March 26 and requested an exhibit showing proposed water and sewer infrastructure and any fire‑water storage that would be needed to meet county standards.

Planning Director Aaron Bach presented the staff report, saying the site is zoned C‑2 (Medium‑Intensity Commercial) under county rules and that a prior general plan amendment and rezone approving commercial uses had already been granted. Bach told commissioners the parcel map would be subject to the county’s Local Agency Management Program (LAM P) for on‑site wastewater: parcels smaller than one acre typically trigger additional LAM P requirements, but county staff said options exist — municipal sewer connection, an on‑site community system, or engineered septic systems approved through a variance process. Bach said environmental health would not allow buildings until any required sewage systems met LAM P standards.

The city’s planning director, Paul Bridal, said the city opposes further entitlements that facilitate commercial development at the site under its growth‑tier policy. Bridal told the commission the city’s growth‑tier system is intended to avoid “leapfrog” development and to ensure services are provided in a planned sequence; he said sewer connection outside the city’s annexation boundary would require special extraterritorial agreements and is not the city’s preferred approach.

Applicant Chase Morgan and consultant David Duda (4 Creeks) said they are pushing to obtain a will‑serve letter from Cal Water but have prepared preliminary engineering for wells and septic systems if municipal service is not provided. Duda said preliminary layouts for wells and septic are complete and the applicant can proceed to civil improvement plans if needed. Morgan told the commission the parcel lines shown on the tentative map could accommodate on‑site infrastructure by easements or minor adjustments and that a property owners’ association could manage shared systems.

Commissioners asked whether Cal Water had issued a will‑serve letter and whether the city’s wastewater treatment plant had capacity. Staff and the city representative said there was not a will‑serve letter in hand; staff said Cal Water had been contacted and earlier conversations had indicated some interest, but no commitment. The city representative said sewer connection would typically be made available upon annexation and argued the project is outside the city’s currently authorized growth tier.

Several commissioners and a nearby resident raised practical concerns: eight proposed lots on the map are under one acre, triggering LAM P issues for standalone commercial septic systems; fire protection could require a sizable storage tank (one commissioner referenced an approximate 100,000‑gallon example), which would affect parcel layouts; and the county must ensure no parcels would be landlocked or allowed to record without required services.

County staff recommended that the applicant provide a schematic exhibit for the tentative map showing proposed well locations, septic or community wastewater locations, and any fire‑water storage or tank locations sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and county policy. The commission set a date‑certain continuance to March 26; staff said any exhibit must be submitted to the county by the Friday before the continued hearing so commissioners have adequate time to review materials under the Brown Act.

No final vote on PPM24‑051 was taken at the hearing. The continuance leaves the tentative map conditionally pending; staff and the applicant will submit the requested infrastructure exhibit and continue work on civil improvement plans and final map engineering.