Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Growth Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears updated growth, enrollment and budget data; schedules work session on Jones Brummett expansion
Summary
District staff presented updated enrollment and site‑planning information, TISA estimates and fast‑growth funds. Board members debated whether to add 12 classrooms at Jones Brummett or pursue a new school; a motion to proceed with the addition failed for lack of a second and a work session was scheduled.
Get email alerts on the School Growth Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff presented updated enrollment figures, site‑preparation work and budget estimates and said the district’s initial TISA estimate rose compared with the prior year.
In the director’s report, staff said current enrollment stood at 4,642 compared with a projection of 4,547 and that projected state funding (TISA) initially was estimated at $28,000,705,400 — about 1.9% higher than the prior year’s figure. Staff also said the district expects $816,000 in non‑recurring fast‑growth funds and that last year those funds were used for the district clinic.
On facilities and growth, staff reviewed earlier site work on the Jones Brummett property and offered three previously discussed options: a 12‑classroom addition to Jones Brummett (estimated then at roughly $4.5 million, with a student capacity increase of roughly 240–260 students), construction of a new school serving about 1,000 students, or a middle‑school buildout sharing a kitchen with the elementary.
Several board members questioned the cost differentials between an addition and a new school; one member noted the earlier estimate for a full rebuild was roughly $23 million versus a later estimate near $45 million and asked for clarification. Board members debated whether an addition would be a “band‑aid” or a necessary near‑term capacity increase. One board member urged proceeding with the addition because funding is available now; another emphasized careful stewardship and exploring all options. A motion to proceed with the Jones Brummett addition was made but failed for lack of a second. Board members agreed to schedule a work session in April (or late March if schedules permit) with facilities staff and the architect Upland Design to review options and cost details before a future vote.
The director’s report also covered staffing projections (an estimated three to six new teaching positions based on enrollment), a second job fair in March, transportation challenges with driver turnover and late bus routes, and the district clinic contract. Staff said the clinic operates under a flat monthly fee rather than per‑visit insurance billing and that they will provide specific contract and cost figures at a follow‑up meeting.
Board members asked staff to compile acreage/feasibility data for district‑owned sites and to involve the construction manager and architect in the planned work session.
