Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Carbon Free Standard topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee sends amendment clarifying Minnesota carbon-free standard applies to in‑state generation
Summary
House File 787, as amended, would clarify that Minnesota's 100% carbon-free-by-2040 law applies to electricity generation sited in Minnesota. The committee approved the DE1 amendment and then placed the bill on the General Register after a roll-call vote (8–7).
Representative Anderson moved House File 787 with the DE1 amendment and the committee approved the amendment by voice vote before advancing the bill to the General Register in a roll-call vote that passed 8–7.
Anderson said the amendment "better aligns the intent of the bill which is to exempt utilities from having to apply the carbon free standard to generation that they may have outside of Minnesota," arguing the change avoids extraterritorial regulation and potential litigation that could be costly to Minnesota taxpayers.
Jonathan Fortner (Lignite Energy Council) testified the amendment is a "common sense clarification" that would prevent Minnesota from attempting to regulate power plants in neighboring states and said North Dakota exports more than "20,000 gigawatt hours of electricity annually" into the MISO grid. He argued the change would avoid legal exposure under the dormant commerce clause and other federal statutes and would support continued cooperation on carbon-capture efforts.
Opponents told the committee the amendment is unnecessary and risks rolling back Minnesota's climate policy. A volunteer testifier identified as Vita Conitz of the Minnesota DFL Environmental Caucus said she was "outraged" after reading the bill and urged members to preserve Minnesota's clean-energy direction. Representative Jones, Representative Hollins and Representative Kraft questioned the bill's necessity, noting prior legal analysis and past work on the state's clean-energy statute.
The Department of Commerce told the committee it sees no need for the amendment and considers the existing carbon-free-by-2040 law constitutional and "thoroughly vetted." Sam Smith, government affairs director at the Department of Commerce, said from the department's perspective "House file 7 87 as amended undermines Minnesota's 2040 plan and does not help us achieve our climate goals by allowing for pulling power that's potentially made with carbon."
Representative Anderson closed by saying the amendment "does not weaken Minnesota's carbon free standard. It simply clarifies that the mandate applies to power generation within our own state."
A roll call was then taken. The clerk recorded eight ayes and seven nays; the committee chair declared the motion passed and sent the amended bill to the General Register.
