Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Calvert County bill: local leaders seek power to stop unpermitted large gatherings
Summary
Delegate Fisher presented House Bill 14‑01, a local bill that would let Calvert County authorize the county attorney or state's attorney to prohibit future gatherings likely to cause a nuisance.
Delegate Fisher presented House Bill 14‑01, a local bill sponsored by the Calvert County delegation that would let Calvert County adopt an ordinance authorizing either the county attorney or the state's attorney to prohibit future events or gatherings when they have a "substantial likelihood" of causing a nuisance or disturbing the peace.
Why it matters: supporters — including the Calvert County commissioners and the county's state's attorney — described the measure as a tool to block unpermitted, large ticketed gatherings that have occurred at foreclosed houses and short‑term rental amenity spaces. John (county attorney) explained the pattern: events are advertised on social media with tickets sold, hundreds attend, alcohol is served and neighbors are left responding after the fact. The bill is intended to allow a proactive response rather than relying only on post‑event disorderly‑house enforcement.
Constitutional concerns and drafting: committee members pressed how the bill would avoid chilling protected speech and whether it would apply only to unpermitted events. Dahlia Phillips asked whether the language could be used against political rallies or demonstrations; the county attorney said the bill was not intended for protected political activity and would have to withstand judicial review. Delegate Fisher and the county attorney said the measure was aimed at unpermitted large parties, and that local ordinance would still be subject to public hearing and legal scrutiny.
Enforcement and penalties: the draft bill allows counties to set penalties and enforcement mechanisms. The county attorney said the existing misdemeanor (10 day jail / $300 fine) for a disorderly house lacks deterrent effect, which partly motivated allowing the county to set a stronger local penalty.
Next steps: the sponsor indicated willingness to work with committee members on amendments and to obtain opinions from the Attorney General's office if requested. No committee vote was recorded in the transcript; the bill drew questions about constitutional limits and local preemption but supporters urged the committee to proceed while resolving drafting details.
