Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agricultural Protection Areas topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances bill to clarify agricultural protection area process and limit non‑ag development on designated land
Summary
Senate Bill 1133, a package of clarifications for the agricultural protection area (APA) statute, was sent to the Senate’s fourteenth order for possible amendment after sponsors and stakeholders described changes to fee limits, application procedures and allowable uses on APA land.
The Senate Local Government and Taxation Committee voted to send Senate Bill 1133 to the fourteenth order for possible amendment after sponsors and stakeholders described technical clarifications and proposed committee amendments.
Senator Ben Adams, District 12 (Nampa), who sponsored the bill, said SB 1133 clarifies the APA application process, limits application fees to administrative cost recovery, and reaffirms that APA designations do not require a rezoning or comprehensive plan amendment. "It clarifies that application fees for APAs are not to exceed the cost of covering those administrative expenses," Roger Batt, representing the Idaho Eastern Oregon Seed Association, told the committee while walking members section‑by‑section through the draft.
The bill also would prohibit non‑agricultural commercial or industrial development on APA‑designated land unless the use directly supports farming operations, and it would clarify that landowners must consent to changes in an APA designation. Sponsors proposed deleting language that would have created an agriculture protection area fund; the committee packet included a one‑page set of proposed amendments that would remove fund language and make other technical edits.
Multiple farmers and industry representatives testified in support of the measure, saying inconsistent county implementation had prevented some landowners from applying for APAs. Farmer Miguel Villafana described a Canyon County ordinance that he said excluded many working farms from applying because of broad “areas of impact.” "This amendment would allow me to come in and apply almost immediately," Villafana said.
The Association of Idaho Cities asked for narrow edits to ensure long‑term taxpayer investments tied to areas of impact are protected. Jonathan Wheatley, AIC deputy director, recommended removing the words "inside or" on page 2, lines 47–48 so that investments by cities and counties are not unintentionally affected. "If that's stricken, then it's gonna be able to protect the area that we're growing and investing taxpayer funds into helping future growth and development," he said.
Senator Den Hartog moved to send SB 1133 to the fourteenth order for possible amendment; Senator Anton seconded and the motion carried by voice vote. Committee members said they would consider the proposed technical amendments and stakeholder suggestions in the amending order.
