Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Professional Practice And Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reiterates: needling that penetrates skin is acupuncture; stakeholders report suspected unlicensed practice
Summary
The committee discussed dry needling/trigger-point needling and enforcement, with the board saying skin penetration constitutes acupuncture under current law and public commenters reporting nurses and other clinicians performing needling at health systems.
At a California Acupuncture Board licensing committee meeting, board staff and members reiterated that needling that penetrates the skin falls under the statutory definition of acupuncture, and stakeholders urged enforcement and outreach after public reports of nonacupuncturists performing needling.
Chair Dr. Amy Matecki told the room the panel is focused on public protection: “The minute you penetrate the skin, it's called acupuncture,” she said, summarizing the practical implication of the board’s view. Executive staff and legal counsel described enforcement options and limits: the board enforces the Acupuncture Practice Act and investigates complaints, but scope questions for other professions are decided by the Legislature or the other professions’ licensing boards.
Several public commenters said nonacupuncturists are performing needling in health systems. Neil Miller of CalAPMA said he had received reports that nurses at Oakland Kaiser were doing acupuncture under physician direction and urged the board to coordinate with the Medical Board of California. “Nurses in Oakland Kaiser are doing acupuncture,” Miller said, and he suggested the board “talk to the medical board to make sure medical doctors understand that it's unprofessional conduct to have these nurses doing this.”
Ben Bodea told the committee that business and professions code provisions restrict delegation and that the board had reached out to the Medical Board and presented at its meeting to advise medical doctors of the relevant code section. Staff said complaints submitted in writing trigger investigation and that anonymous allegations are harder to pursue because they limit available witnesses.
Stakeholders also raised jurisdictional limits: needling performed on federal property such as Veterans Affairs hospitals may fall under federal oversight, and state boards have limited jurisdiction in those settings. The committee did not adopt new enforcement policy at the meeting but encouraged the public to file complaints with the board and asked stakeholders to share evidence and information so staff could assess possible investigations.
