Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Refunds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance committee reviews and approves refunds for multiple duplicate tax payments totaling six figures
Summary
At a March 11 New Castle County Finance Committee meeting, members considered several resolutions to approve refunds for duplicate tax and sewer payments. Council members raised concern about why overpayments occur repeatedly and discussed administrative causes; all refund items were moved forward in committee.
New Castle County Council Finance Committee Chair Councilman John Cartier presided over a March 11 meeting at which members considered a string of resolutions to refund duplicate tax and sewer payments to property owners and agencies.
The committee reviewed four refund resolutions requiring council approval because each refund exceeded the county—s $20,000 threshold. The amounts and recipients recorded in the committee discussion were: $154,302.10 to Concord Gallery Incorporated (Resolution 25-043); $45,183.19 in taxes plus $1,861.90 in sewer fees to the Delaware State Housing Authority (Resolution 25-044); $65,256.35 on parcel Ten-006.000-32 (Resolution 25-045); and $27,963.21 to LPC First State Holding Company (Resolution 25-046).
The refunds were presented sequentially; after discussion the chair called for the voice approvals. There were no public comments recorded during the refund items. Committee members voiced concern about recurring overpayments. Councilman Strickland said of the pattern of errors, "excuses are tools of incompetence. Those who specialize in their use of seldom capable of anything else. Therefore, there are no excuses." Councilman Smiley explained a common administrative cause: he said many overpayments result from transitions between accounting firms, where a payment is credited and subsequent accounting creates duplicate records unless the business or property owner requests a refund.
Committee members asked whether additional internal controls or audits could reduce repeat overpayments; no specific new audit policy was adopted during the meeting. The chair closed the refund section and the committee moved to other agenda items.
Notes on procedure: the committee discussed each resolution and the chair called for voice votes. No individual roll-call tallies were recorded in the public audio of the committee; the transcript records the committee—s voice approvals for each item.
