Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water And Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House backs bill giving county supervisors discretion on rural housing tied to water disclosures amid opposition
Summary
House Bill 2574, which lets county supervisors opt into an affordable‑housing mechanism in certain non‑AMA rural areas and specifies seller disclosures, received a do‑pass recommendation after debate that included opposition emphasizing water law and consumer protections.
Get email alerts on the Water And Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Bill 2574, debated in the Committee of the Whole, would create an option for county supervisors to permit certain affordable‑housing development in non‑Active Management Areas (AMAs) and includes seller disclosure provisions. The Committee of the Whole reported the bill do pass as amended and the House later recorded a floor vote in which the bill received 31 ayes and 25 nays.
Representative Griffin, sponsor of the committee amendment and subsequent floor amendments, described the measure as intended for non‑AMA and rural areas where supervisors had requested the option. Griffin said the bill allows supervisors to opt in or opt out and emphasized full disclosure requirements on property conditions.
Representative De Los Santos rose in opposition, calling the bill "another loophole in our water laws" that could allow developers to take advantage of home buyers and strip consumers of protections. De Los Santos urged a no vote, saying it "makes it easier for corporate developers to take advantage of home buyers and in fact strips home buyers of basic consumer protections."
After debate and a division requested for verification, the committee recommendation for HB 2574 as amended was confirmed on the floor. The clerk recorded the final vote on the floor as 31 ayes and 25 nays in favor of reporting the bill as amended to do pass.
Ending: The Committee of the Whole reported HB 2574 as amended to do pass and the House recorded a 31–25 floor tally in favor of the committee recommendation; the bill was referred to engrossing per later House business entries.
