Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Regulatory Ethics topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House committee advances bill limiting post‑service employment for regulators to reduce perceived regulatory capture

2545262 · March 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 2518, which would restrict employment or appointments after service with utility regulators for a period tied to the commission term, was debated for its scope and reach and received a do-pass recommendation from the Committee of the Whole after floor questions and assurances about narrowly defined aims.

The Committee of the Whole recommended that House Bill 2518 receive a do-pass recommendation after floor-level questions about the bill's scope and potential unintended consequences.

Representative Olsen sponsored the bill and spoke to its intent: to reduce incentives that might lead to regulatory capture by restricting post‑service employment related to government‑granted monopolies. House debate included question‑and‑answer exchanges about the bill's reach, including whether the language could unintentionally bar certain categories of workers. Representative Tapper (questioner) and Representative Wells (sponsor response) discussed the bill's focus on regulators of government‑granted monopolies and the use of a four‑year period tied to a typical commission term.

Wells told colleagues that the bill targets "regulatory capture" concerns and is not meant to prohibit free enterprise broadly. He said the restriction is limited to positions tied to the entities regulated by the commission and that the four‑year term was chosen to match commission service. Members expressed willingness to consider narrower, clarifying amendments if necessary; the sponsor invited follow-up conversations to address unintended consequences.

After questions, the Committee of the Whole adopted the bill as amended and reported it do pass. The transcript records give-and-take on definitions (for example, how broadly "regulatory entity" is defined) and assurances that language could be refined if it inadvertently captures unintended positions.

Ending: The Committee of the Whole reported HB 2518 as amended to do pass; members who asked for clarification said they would work with the sponsor on potential amendments in the Senate if needed.