Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board recommends Common Council consider ordinance to streamline minor site-plan changes
Summary
The Planning Board voted to recommend that the Common Council consider ordinance number 9788, which would create administrative criteria allowing certain minor construction or landscaping changes to be approved without full board review, with checks and recording procedures included.
The Rome Planning Board voted on May 6 to recommend that the Common Council consider ordinance number 9788, an amendment to Rome Code Chapter 80, Article Section 80-19.4, that would establish criteria for administrative approval of minor changes to approved site plans.
Planning staff explained the proposal would create clear criteria and a paper trail for minor, non-substantial changes that previously required return to the full planning board. Garrett, a planning staff member, told the board the amendment was intended to reduce unnecessary delays where small modifications arise during construction. Garrett said the proposed language would define “who’s approving what” and “create a paper trail so everyone knows when modifications are approved.”
Board members discussed safeguards. One board member, Jim, said he had reviewed the ordinance and saw it as implementing “checks and balances,” saying that if the planning board is uncomfortable with a change, it would be returned to the full board for review. Jim noted the change would avoid unnecessary delay while preserving the board’s oversight for changes considered substantial.
The board voted to recommend the ordinance to the Common Council; the recommendation carries with the understanding that the planning director (in practice the deputy director of community and economic development) and the planning-board chair would have defined sign-off authority for eligible minor modifications.
What it means: Under the proposed amendment, truly minor changes (for example, moving a shrub that would not materially alter site function) could be approved administratively with recordkeeping; larger or potentially substantive changes would still be returned to the full planning board.
