Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Long Time Homeowners Assistance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh boosting Long-Time Homeowners Assistance as revaluation raises tax burdens
Summary
Orange County staff told commissioners Tuesday that long-time homeowners in last year—s assistance cohort saw assessed values jump about 59 percent pre-appeal, and that the manager's recommended budget would raise average tax burdens for that cohort by roughly 22 percent.
Orange County staff and commissioners spent a substantive portion of the May 22 budget work session on the Long-Time Homeowners Assistance Program (LTHA), reviewing modeling of last year's applicants and considering amendments to help homeowners facing larger tax bills after the revaluation.
Kirk, housing staff, said the county added $24,000 to the LTHA in the manager's recommended budget and reallocated funding to increase emergency housing assistance. He presented analysis of last year's applicant cohort and said pre-appeal assessed values for that group rose about 59 percent from the prior year — a level higher than the county average. Based on that cohort, Kirk said the average homeowner in the cohort would see about a 16 percent increase in tax burden under revenue-neutral rates and about a 22 percent increase under the manager's recommended budget.
Kirk explained that program benefits are shared among applicants, so the number of applicants affects the per-household award. He said last year's county award produced an average post-award tax reduction of about 25 percent for recipients; restoring that level of post-award relief for the same cohort in the current year would require substantially more funding. Kirk presented funding scenarios that showed different per-household averages at varying budget levels; staff noted the manager's recommended LTHA allocation was approximately $274,000 and that a more generous scenario would require roughly $501,000 to achieve higher per-household relief for the same cohort.
Commissioners expressed concerns about consistency for households who previously received awards. “If I was a homeowner and I—d applied to this program because I am struggling to pay my property tax, that one thing I really want is consistency,” said Commissioner Jean Minearo, who urged the board to consider the homeowner view when evaluating program rule changes. Commissioner Earl said he opposed narrowing eligibility in a way that would make people eligible last year ineligible this year.
Others encouraged a modest budget amendment to increase funding for LTHA for the current cycle. Chair Bedford and other commissioners asked staff to draft a proposed tentative budget amendment so the public could see options before the board's intent-to-adopt and public-hearing steps. Kirk and staff said the final award per household would depend on the number of applicants and the program rules the board adopts.
The board did not change program rules at the session; commissioners asked staff for modeling and proposed amendment language to consider before formal votes.
