Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Alcohol Licenses topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Delegation tables three alcohol license measures pending drafting and community feedback

2651850 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Washington County Delegation tabled three alcohol-license bills -- a Class B-EX exemption license, a consolidated seven-day Class B license with seating/hours changes, and a bed-and-breakfast alcohol license -- after identifying drafting errors and raising policy questions.

The Washington County Delegation tabled three alcohol-license proposals during its meeting after staff and members identified drafting errors, ambiguity about fees and hours, and concerns about business impacts.

The measures considered included: a new class B-EX exemption license intended as a catchall for activities not covered by existing license classes (examples discussed included ax-throwing and virtual golf); a proposal to consolidate the existing six-day license and a separate Sunday permit into a single seven-day Class B license that would change minimum seating from 50 to 15 and standardize hours; and a proposal to create an alcohol license for bed-and-breakfast establishments (beer and wine, per staff).

Vaughn, the staff member who explained the exemption license, said the Class B-EX item was intended as a "catchall" for activities without a current license class and gave examples such as ax throwing and virtual golf. Vaughn also said the version the delegation had in hand did not match the intended draft and that a different draft the delegation had reviewed earlier was for a restaurant license rather than the exemption license under consideration. Because the committee did not have the correct language in front of them, members voted to table the exemption license for further drafting.

On the consolidated seven-day license, members debated several substantive points: fees, occupancy and seating thresholds, and operating hours on Sundays. Staff described the consolidation as combining existing license fees (for example, a Sunday permit fee and a weekday fee) so the consolidated fee would equal the sum of the prior separate fees and would not increase the total fee. Members questioned whether small businesses with seating for as few as 15 would be required to pay the same flat fee as much larger establishments and suggested considering a graduated fee. Senator Quarterman raised concern that the change could force small proprietors who currently opt out of Sunday service to purchase a full seven-day license.

There was also discussion about hours: the draft standardizes operating hours to 6 a.m. to 2 a.m. Monday through Sunday, which would potentially allow earlier Sunday openings than current special-Sunday permits. Staff noted that existing special-Sunday hours for on-sale retail were 11 a.m. to midnight, and that licensed restaurants historically could open earlier when serving a meal. Members asked staff to clarify whether the consolidated hours would alter those existing allowances and whether communities had been consulted. Because those questions remained unresolved and the drafting did not reflect the intended language in some places, the delegation voted to table the seven-day license proposal.

The bed-and-breakfast license was similarly tabled. Delegates who represent tourism and small-business areas said some local innkeepers had called to ask whether they needed a license; proponents said the change would align Washington County with other counties that have a similar license. Opponents cautioned the change could impose burdens on small operators who would need to order alcohol through distributors and might face fees they consider disproportionate to their businesses' scale. With the draft not available on the house side and open questions about fee levels and operational details, the delegation tabled that bill as well.

For all three items, members noted the filing deadline and rules process constraints. The chair said the delegation could file the current drafts and pursue resolution through rules or could wait and redraft for the following year. Staff said they would circulate correct drafts for members to review; members requested additional clarification on fees, community impact and hours before reconvening.

No public comment on the alcohol measures was recorded.