Resident proposes rule to prevent fireworks residue on neighbors' property; council refers measure to police and fire committee

A Marysville resident told the council she had fireworks shot "aimed at my house" and proposed an ordinance addition that would bar anyone from igniting fireworks that discharge or cause residue to fall onto property other than the shooter's.

"No person shall ignite or discharge fireworks to discharge or cause residue to fall into or go onto property of other than the person igniting or discharging the fireworks," the resident proposed, asking the council to protect vulnerable residents and those with respiratory conditions. She said police previously told her there was nothing in current city ordinances covering the "overhead airspace" above private property.

Council members and the police chief raised enforcement concerns. Chief Simpson noted that existing littering codes might apply, but "intent has to be proven and that is impossible without video evidence or pictures" for many cases involving smoke, particulate or drifting residue. Council discussion also emphasized the difference between criminal conduct (harassment or assault) and time/place/manner or property-code changes.

Given those enforcement questions, councilmembers agreed to send the proposed amendment to the police and fire committee for review and to consider language that incorporates intent (for example, prohibiting "intentionally" discharging fireworks over someone else's property). The committee will evaluate options that balance public safety, enforceability, and residents' concern about fireworks drifting onto nearby yards.

No ordinance change was adopted at the meeting; staff and the police and fire committee will return recommendations before the summer holiday period.