Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jersey Shore Area SD approves personnel slate, building projects and financing parameters
Summary
At its March 10 regular meeting the Jersey Shore Area School District board approved personnel actions, curriculum and building-and-grounds contracts, and a parameters resolution to seek up to $12 million in general obligation bonds.
The Jersey Shore Area School District Board of School Directors approved multiple routine and substantive items by voice vote at its March 10 meeting, including a slate of personnel actions, contracts for building-and-grounds work and a parameters resolution allowing the district to pursue up to $12,000,000 in general obligation bonds.
The board voted to approve personnel items listed as A through S and passed curriculum, buildings-and-grounds and miscellaneous consent items. The board also approved finance items A through E; the finance package included a parameters resolution authorizing pursuit of one or more general obligation bond issues up to $12,000,000, with an upper rate parameter shown at 5.5% though presenters said projected market rates were expected to be near 4%.
Why it matters: The bond parameters resolution is the first formal step that allows bond counsel and the district's financial advisers to structure and price a debt offering. Board members said the higher listed rate is a ceiling for the resolution, not the expected sale rate.
Details of the votes: Board President opened each consent block, asked for a motion and, after motions and seconds, took voice votes. For several items the record shows the board chair asked, "All those in favor say aye," followed by "All those opposed? Motion passes." No roll-call tallies were read aloud in the transcript.
The board also approved buildings-and-grounds items that will support an ongoing multi-year facilities work plan discussed earlier in the meeting; that work plan includes unit-ventilator replacements, lighting upgrades and other mechanical and safety work listed in documents from SiteLogic (see separate article on the facilities discussion).
What was not specified: The meeting record did not provide a roll-call vote tally for the motions; votes were taken by voice and recorded in the minutes as passing. Movers and seconders for the consent blocks were not named in the public transcript.
