Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Developmental Services Revisions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developmental Services bill would allow insulin autoinjector use, create limited financial guardianship and expand abuse registry
Summary
House Bill 7156 would let trained unlicensed staff administer insulin using autoinjector pens and epinephrine, authorize limited financial guardianships in narrowly defined circumstances, and permit the Department of Developmental Services to refer community companion home licensees to an abuse-and-neglect registry — changes the department told the Public Health Committee it designed to increase safety while preserving independence.
House Bill 7156, a package of statutory changes proposed by the Department of Developmental Services, would make three principal changes affecting people with intellectual disability and the agencies that serve them. At a March 10 public hearing, Department officials and the probate court administrator described the bill to the Public Health Committee and answered lawmakers’ questions.
The most immediate change in the draft would allow medication administration by trained unlicensed personnel to include insulin autoinjector pens as well as epinephrine injectors. "Autoinjectors are much simpler to use," Jordan Sheff, Commissioner of the Department of Developmental Services, told the committee, explaining that the department would require additional, specific training and regulatory safeguards before unlicensed staff could give those injections. He said the department planned to work with the Department of Public Health and its own health services director to write procedures and codify oversight.
Why it matters: Commissioner Sheff said the change would avert the need to station nurses 24/7 in every community companion home where a resident uses insulin or to move residents back and forth to clinics for routine injections — both costly and disruptive options. Senators and representatives pressed the department on who would check doses and how blood glucose testing would be handled; Sheff and his staff said assessments would remain the domain of licensed clinicians but that MedCERT training for unlicensed medication administrators already covers core safety checks and would be expanded for injectables.
The bill also would permit the probate court to appoint a limited financial guardian for certain people who need help managing modest amounts — an option the department and the probate court administrator said they had worked on for two years. "It really just adds an additional mechanism for those petitions to be filed when there is a need to manage limited assets," Beverly Strait, probate court administrator, told the committee. Marjorie Wakeman, legal director for DDS, said the measure is intended to preserve independence by avoiding more cumbersome conservatorship procedures when someone needs only narrow help with paying bills or managing modest assets.
Another key provision would allow the Department of Developmental Services to add community companion home (CCH) licensees and their designees to the department’s abuse-and-neglect registry when there are substantiated findings, and to share the registry with probate court administrators. Sheff told the committee that current statute restricts referrals to registry only to employees of DDS; licensees who are not employees fall into a statutory gap. Enabling referrals and limited sharing with probate judges is intended to prevent appointing a guardian who has a substantiated record of abuse or neglect, the department said. Sheff and Wakeman emphasized that the registry process includes fact‑finding, a hearing and appeal rights.
What lawmakers asked: Committee members sought specifics on training hours, exactly how insulin would be administered, and what tests and monitoring a nurse would still be required to perform — questions the department said it would answer in regulatory language. Several lawmakers also asked whether the limited financial guardianship would preserve the represented person’s agency; both Wakeman and Judge Strait said respondents would receive counsel and that the authority sought in those petitions would be narrowly tailored.
Next steps: Department officials said the bill language is not final and that they had been working with the probate court administrator to refine a substitute. Committee members and witnesses also asked the department to provide more detailed training outlines and to supply the committee with clarifying regulatory language as the bill is amended.
Ending: Supporters framed the bill as a mix of consumer protections and practical fixes: enabling safe, less‑restrictive medication administration in community homes, offering a narrowly tailored option to help people manage modest assets, and closing a registry gap to keep guardianship decisions informed. Department witnesses said they would return with more detailed regulatory language as the bill moves through the process.
