Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ordinance Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Easley City discusses numbering error during second reading of ordinance to amend code section 99.01

2531841 · March 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During a March 10 Easley City Council work session, councilmembers reviewed the second reading of Ordinance 2025-01 to amend section 99.01 of chapter 99, title 9 of the Easley City Code and identified a numerical formatting error in the draft ordinance text.

Easley City Council held the second reading of Ordinance 2025-01 on March 10, 2025, a measure to amend section 99.01 of chapter 99 of title 9 of the Easley City Code. Councilmembers reviewed the ordinance text and identified a numbering error in the draft.

Councilmembers said the ordinance had been discussed and voted on previously, and the second reading focused on a formatting issue. One councilmember noted what they described as “a numerical error on page 5,” saying, “You fixed the 1, but it created a second 1. Yeah. Because 5 is disappearing, so 6 will then be 5.” That comment prompted brief confirmation from other members that the numbering needed correction before final adoption.

No formal vote on final adoption of Ordinance 2025-01 is recorded in the work session transcript. The council’s discussion was limited to the text correction and confirmation that the substantive policy had been considered at the prior meeting.

The ordinance is identified in meeting materials as Ordinance 2025-01 and references section 99.01 of chapter 99, title 9 of the Easley City Code. The transcript shows the matter was on its second reading and councilmembers reviewed the draft for clerical and numbering accuracy.

The council moved on to other agenda items following the exchange; the transcript does not record any additional edits or a final vote on Ordinance 2025-01 during the March 10 work session.