Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves 4‑lot Grama Richmond preliminary subdivision in AG‑5 zone
Summary
The Eastern Summit County Planning Commission voted to approve a preliminary subdivision for a 30‑acre AG‑5 parcel north of Hanover that would create four 1‑acre buildable lots and a 26‑acre remainder parcel, subject to conditions including clarification of how unused density may be applied in the future.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Eastern Summit County Planning Commission voted to approve the preliminary subdivision application for the Grama Richmond property, a 30‑acre parcel in the AG‑5 zone north of the municipality of Hanover that was proposed to be divided into four 1‑acre buildable lots and a 26‑acre remainder parcel.
County planner Jennifer Strader told the commission the application was among the first subdivisions processed under the county's recently revised subdivision ordinance and therefore included more conditions than prior applications. "Once it is complete, we have 15 business days at staff and all service providers to compile any conditions or any requirements that need to be met for that subdivision to comply with the code," Strader said, describing the new preliminary/final review workflow.
Strader said the applicant requested four buildable lots even though the AG‑5 zoning allows up to six units; any additional density would require a separate future subdivision application. "One of the conditions of approval is just to clarify how the additional density can be used in the future," she said, describing a staff condition to relabel the remainder parcel on the plat and add a clarifying note on the mylar.
Commissioners and staff discussed access and fire‑department requirements. Strader said the applicant had recorded an easement that secures the private road turnaround the Park City Fire District requires: "It's essential because the fire department requires a safe turnaround if they were to have to fight a fire on that lot," she said. Staff noted that the turnaround includes a portion that passes onto a neighboring property and that the recorded easement provides the necessary right‑of‑way.
Commissioners also reviewed procedural elements of the new ordinance. County planning staff member Ray (last name not specified) outlined the post‑preliminary timeline and appeal route: after the preliminary approval the final plat review may require up to multiple 20‑day cycles, and if a dispute remained after multiple cycles an appeal process could involve an ombudsman appointed under state procedures. Ray described the process as "a long and painful journey" that the state has prescribed.
The commission voted to approve the preliminary subdivision "pursuant to the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and conditions of approval in the report," with the motion and second recorded on the public record and the chair announcing the approval. The motion included a staff correction to a condition that referenced the fire district by name.
Next steps: the applicant must meet the staff and service‑provider conditions listed in the staff report and resubmit for final plat approval and mylar signature by the county manager; if the final submittal does not meet requirements the manager will not sign the mylar and additional review cycles or appeals may follow.
