Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rural Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials propose adding rural‑preservation placeholder to Greene County CIP discussion
Summary
Several board and commission members urged the county to include a placeholder for rural preservation programs — including conservation easements and potential transfer of development rights tools — in the CIP or near‑term workplan, though they noted funding for such programs may be operational rather than capital.
At the CIP workshop, supervisors and planning commissioners raised concern that Greene County's top strategic priority — rural preservation — was not reflected with specific projects in the capital improvement program despite residential development pressure and recent scenic‑highway designations.
One board member urged that the county should consider funding tools that support voluntary conservation, such as purchase of development rights or transfer/development‑rights programs. Participants discussed existing programs, including state and federal tax‑credit and payment programs (described in the meeting as an ALES program) that can help landowners preserve agricultural land by buying development rights in cash with a portion received as tax credits.
Staff said rural preservation efforts are often funded from operational budgets rather than capital accounts. Officials suggested placing a placeholder item in the CIP or convening a small working group of board and commission members and staff to scope voluntary incentive programs and identify potential grants or funding mechanisms.
Why it matters: participants described rural preservation as the county's number one strategic priority in its comprehensive plan, and they said an explicit work item would help the county seek grants and consider revenue options such as tourism taxes to support voluntary preservation programs.
Staff agreed to find an appropriate place for a placeholder and to explore grant and revenue options; no funding decisions were made at the workshop.
