Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wastewater Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Milford council votes to proceed with original wastewater lift-station plan, warns scope changes could jeopardize funding
Summary
At a Feb. 25 work session, the Milford City Council voted to continue engineering and construction of the lift station under the original scope after staff warned that changing the project could risk Community Impact Board funding. Councilmembers moved and seconded the instruction to proceed; the motion carried.
The Milford City Council at a Feb. 25 work session instructed engineers to continue with the original wastewater lift-station design and funding plan, after staff said changing the scope would likely forfeit current Community Impact Board (CIB) funding and require reapplication.
Councilmember Scott moved to continue with the original plan and to instruct the city’s engineers to carry on; Councilmember Russell seconded the motion. The motion was approved after members present responded "Aye" and the chair declared the motion carried.
The council heard several technical and funding points before voting. Ben Corey, identified in the meeting as a project engineer, described the lift station design the city is using and said it matches a design recently installed in Delta, where officials reported no complaints. Council members discussed a separate, more elaborate model seen in Cedar City that some staff favored, but meeting participants emphasized that switching to a different design now would change the project scope.
Staff cited conversations with CIB and local officials indicating there is no supplemental CIB funding available for scope changes between cycles. The council was told that supplemental funds are typically permitted only when an approved project is already underway and then runs short because of unforeseen cost escalation; changing the originally approved scope would require returning the awarded money, reapplying, and risking a different funding outcome.
Meeting speakers described technical details the council considered: the planned pumps are 5-horsepower units that staff said can be removed and repaired in a shop in 15–30 minutes, and officials said a small covered structure could be added later to house controls. Staff recommended proceeding with the design currently on the application to preserve existing funding and avoid reopening the CIB process.
Council members also noted the engineers and operations staff can continue internal conversations about covers, access, and pump maintenance without altering the submitted project scope. After the vote, the chair said there was no further business on the item and the council moved on.
Votes and formal action
Motion: Continue with the original scope of the wastewater lift-station project and instruct the city’s engineer to proceed with the design and funding as submitted to CIB. Mover: Scott (Councilmember) Second: Russell (Councilmember) Outcome: Approved (motion carried; vote recorded as "Aye"; individual roll-call tallies were not recorded in the transcript.)
Why it matters
The council’s decision preserves the project as submitted to CIB and avoids a reapplication that staff said would risk losing the city’s current place in the funding cycle. That preserves the city’s engineered proposal, schedule and the funding package tied to that scope.
