Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee debates tighter rules for landfill permitting, third‑party reviews and leachate plans

2651030 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Solid Waste Subcommittee and the House Environment & Agriculture Committee debated amendments this week that would let DES screen landfill permit applications for completeness during a moratorium, create a two‑stage net public benefit screen using an applicant‑funded independent third‑party assessment, and require more detailed leachate management plans.

The Solid Waste Subcommittee and the House Environment & Agriculture Committee spent multiple sessions this week considering several bills that would change how New Hampshire reviews and permits new solid waste facilities. Lawmakers and agency staff discussed four core ideas: allowing the Department of Environmental Services (DES) to accept and screen applications for completeness during a moratorium, carving out an exception to automatic approval rules, creating an initial two‑stage “net public benefit” screen that uses an applicant‑funded independent third party, and strengthening leachate‑management planning and contract transparency for permitted landfills.

At the subcommittee level, Representative John Germana (sponsor) and Representative Gruber worked with DES Director Mike Wimsatt to draft technical amendments to the moratorium bill (HB171). The changes would let DES accept applications and evaluate them only for completeness while a moratorium is in effect, so a file would be ready for full review when the moratorium ends. The amendment adds a “notwithstanding” clause to prevent an automatic approval triggered by current statutory time limits, and removes language DES identified as unnecessary or technically inaccurate.

DES Director Mike Wimsatt told members the completeness review is intended only to make sure an application file is administratively ready, not to begin technical permitting. He also said that if law or rule changes occur during a moratorium, applicants would likely need to augment their applications to comply with any new legal requirements; sponsors discussed adding explicit language to that effect so it is clear to applicants and reviewers.

Separately, Representative Germana previewed an amendment to HB215 that would add a two‑stage review. Under the proposal, DES would first perform an…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans