Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Lawmakers split over whether towns should keep excess SWEP funds as court cases loom

2650881 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members of the House education committee spent the morning debating multiple bills that would change how the statewide education property tax (SWEP) is treated when a municipality’s local share exceeds calculated adequacy aid.

Members of the House education committee spent the morning debating multiple bills that would change how the statewide education property tax (commonly called SWEP or “swept”) is treated when a municipality’s local share exceeds calculated adequacy aid.

The committee discussed HB137, introduced by Representative Cordelli, which would allow municipalities to keep excess SWEP funds and spend them on education-related purposes. Representative Spilsbury framed the debate as the opposite approach, noting he had introduced a bill the previous day that would remit excess swept funds to the Department of Revenue Administration (DRA). “I do think it’s a fundamental conversation for the committee,” Spilsbury said, “our hand hasn’t been forced yet, but it’s moving towards the inevitable that we need to call for the excess to be remitted to the DRA.”

Why it…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans