Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand Island board debates PDD concept plan, wildlife corridor and next review steps
Summary
Town board members discussed a proposed Planned Development District (PDD) concept plan for a large subdivision, questions about a wildlife corridor, and whether to refer the incomplete application to advisory boards or table it until financial and application materials are complete.
Members of the Grand Island Town Board spent extended time reviewing a developer’s conceptual Planned Development District (PDD) application and whether to refer it to other review bodies or delay action until the application is complete.
The board discussed the developer’s request for conceptual approval of a zoning change and a PDD overlay. Board members and staff emphasized the distinction between concept approval and a final, binding PDD: a concept plan directs next steps but “nothing is really binding until the PDD is ultimately approved,” said Peter (staff member). He added that adoption of a local law would be required for zoning changes to become binding and that financial commitments and a developer identification are elements that typically must be resolved before final approval.
Why it matters: Board approval of a concept plan and any subsequent PDD or local law would change allowable uses, density and development standards on the parcels in question and could affect buffers such as the proposed wildlife corridor that residents have raised concerns about.
Board discussion and key points
- Several members said they wanted to avoid approving a final plan before financial and ownership pieces are submitted. One board member noted, “I don't to my knowledge, we don't have all the pieces in place that you could vote on it today to approve it,” and urged caution.
- The group debated whether to send the latest plan to the Planning Board and to an economic development advisory group for review. A motion was offered to refer “the latest plan to the planning board and to an economic development” board; board members then noted the application is not complete. Several members favored tabling the item until the application is complete; one board member said, “I would agree that with public hearing, you need a complete application.”
- The wildlife corridor was a recurring topic. Board members asked whether adding or restoring a wildlife corridor after concept approval would be considered a “substantial deviation” from the concept plan. Peter (staff member) said that whether adding the corridor would be a substantial deviation would need to be decided at the time, and that deviations hinge on whether density, unit counts or types would materially change.
Next steps and procedural limits
Board members stressed the discretionary nature of PDD and rezoning actions and that a full PDD application (including financial commitments and appropriate documentation) is necessary before a public hearing can be scheduled. Several members recommended having the applicant complete the application and providing the Planning Board with a completed site plan so the Planning Board can review and offer comments in advance of any public hearing.
No formal final vote on the PDD or the wildlife corridor was recorded in the workshop transcript; board members indicated the likely procedural path: require a complete application, then schedule public hearing(s) and refer to advisory bodies as needed.
