Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah County Commission urges state review of centralized mental health hospital model in Provo
Summary
Commissioners approved a resolution encouraging the state to evaluate whether Utah's century-old centralized state mental health hospital model should be revised, including potential sale of the Provo property and creating smaller or more distributed facilities to improve access and staffing.
The Utah County Commission approved a resolution urging the state to evaluate the centralized state mental health hospital model and consider facility relocation or reconfiguration to improve access and staffing.
Commissioner (Speaker 5) moved to approve the resolution with two amendments offered by Commissioner Beltran; Commissioner (Speaker 4) seconded the motion and the commission approved it by voice vote. The transcript captures two commissioners saying "aye" and the chair declaring the motion passed.
Commissioner (Speaker 5) noted the state mental health hospital is located in Provo and described the centralized model as having been in place for about 140 years, with the facility founded "about 1885" according to remarks in the meeting. The resolution asks the state to study whether the long-standing centralized model remains the best way to serve people with serious mental illness and whether selling the Provo property to reinvest in multiple or better-placed facilities would improve access.
Commissioners discussed operational issues the facility faces, including unfilled beds and a waiting list tied to staffing shortages. Commissioner (Speaker 5) said placing smaller facilities closer to larger population centers might aid recruitment and better utilize capacity. A commissioner also noted that when the hospital exists in a particular location the county receives "12 beds" allotted to the area, and said that arrangement did not fully serve local needs.
The motion was approved with the amendments as referenced in the meeting; the transcript indicates the amended resolution will be given to county staff named Ruth Ann for processing, but does not record further action by the state or a timeline for evaluation.
