Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design board gives conceptual guidance for Theater of the Republic restroom plan and storefront windows
Summary
Design review board heard a conceptual presentation from the Theater of the Republic about placing required restrooms behind the building's front windows at 1014 Fourth Avenue and suggested spandrel glass or other coated glazing; the applicants were asked to return with detailed renderings and material samples.
The Conway Design Review Board heard a conceptual presentation from city staff and the applicant on plans to convert 1014 Fourth Avenue for use by the Theater of the Republic and discussed where required restrooms could be located without permanently degrading the storefront facade.
Miss Dennis, a city staff presenter, said, "The Theater of the Republic has recently acquired the 1014 Fourth Avenue Building, and they are proposing to utilize the building as a black box theater." She said the building's 1925 construction triggers restroom requirements for the proposed use and that applicants had explored interior options before identifying a location near the front windows.
Applicant Tim McGee described the proposed interior layout and constraints, saying, "We're going to remove, the archway to make it bigger, and that would be the stage," and noting the venue would seat about 70 people in the new space. McGee said architects and an engineer reviewed code and that locating the restrooms elsewhere on the main floor would consume roughly half the usable area, leaving an impractically small audience area.
Board members and the building code official discussed alternatives for preserving the storefront appearance if restrooms are installed behind the display windows. Robert Cooper, the city's building code official, recommended a nontransparent glazing product, explaining that "you can probably keep the windows and put something in called spandrel glass, which is you can't see through. But from the outside, it looks it's glass." Board members also raised the historic-downtown look and the eventual reusability of the storefront by a future tenant if the glazing remains visibly storefront-like.
Staff noted that use of coated or spandrel glass would affect what can be displayed in those windows. The board clarified that sign regulations would still apply to any promotional materials placed on or inside the glass and that those details would be reviewed by staff later in the process.
The board treated the item as a conceptual review; no final approvals or conditions were adopted. Staff directed the applicant to return with formal renderings, material samples (including proposed spandrel/coated glazing), and a more detailed floor plan to allow a formal vote at a future meeting. The building code official indicated staff or inspectors may need to review interior layouts during formal application review.
Next steps: the applicant will prepare renderings and material specifications and return to the board for formal review and vote.
