Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sports Facility Wnba topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears plans for proposed WNBA practice facility in southern Dallas; environmental remediation and community benefits discussed
Summary
Board members discussed a proposed women’s professional practice facility (Wings/WNBA) on a donated, remediated site in southern Dallas, covering site selection, environmental testing, public access and partner community benefits; no final board vote was recorded in the transcript.
The Dallas Parks and Recreation Board spent substantial time on June 5 discussing a proposed practice and training facility for a professional women’s team (referred to in the meeting as the Wings/WNBA project) and the city‑selected site in southern Dallas.
Board members asked staff detailed questions about site selection, environmental remediation, zoning, community engagement and how the facility would provide public benefits and access. Staff described the preferred site as donated, previously remediated land that staff and the city’s real estate and planning teams judged to be suitable for rapid development and consistent with the Parks master plan.
Context and site selection: Parks staff said they examined multiple locations before recommending the proposed site, noting that one potential site posed expensive terrain remediation and that the proposed site was relatively flat and had undergone environmental mitigation when it was donated. Staff said the site is about 15 minutes from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport and checked “all of the boxes” the city used for rapid development of a practice facility and partner programming. Board members asked why Fair Park and the Coliseum were not selected; staff said the Coliseum would require substantial renovation and did not fit WNBA standards without significant cost.
Environmental and zoning issues: Board member Miss Mandel asked whether a previous site issue like the MoneyGram batch plant problem could recur; staff and planners said the donated site had been remediated and that planning staff judged the area’s land‑use context (flex commercial bordering community residential) to reduce the likelihood of nearby heavy industrial uses such as batch plants. City planning member Mister Karimi added that the proposed site’s current flex commercial designation and surrounding land uses made heavy industrial reuse unlikely under the city’s land‑use guidance.
Public benefits and access: Staff said the proposed agreement would include public‑benefit commitments such as viewing areas for the public to observe practice, clinics and foundation‑led community programs. The Wings foundation and the team were described as planning to coordinate with local community partners and nonprofits to run clinics and career‑oriented programming (sports management, athletic careers) for youth.
Concerns raised and follow‑up requested: Board members and public speakers asked for the project master plan and for confirmation of the city’s intended public uses and hours so that youth and community programs are not squeezed by professional use. Staff agreed to supply the master plan and further details to the board. No formal roll‑call vote adopting or rejecting the site or a contract was recorded in the provided transcript; the discussion was presented to the board ahead of council consideration.
