Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission adopts amended objective design standards to cover certain single-family and ADU projects
Summary
Commissioners approved revisions adding single-family and accessory-unit modules to the city’s objective design standards and left architectural-style rules largely unchanged; the motion passed 4-0.
The Temecula Planning Commission voted 4-0 to adopt amendments that expand the city’s objective design standards to cover certain single-family residential projects and accessory dwelling units (ADUs) when those projects are being processed under state “streamlined” pathways.
Eric Jones, a city planning staffer, told commissioners the amendment responds to recent state legislation that requires objective standards for some residential projects. Jones said the city previously applied the standards to multifamily and mixed-use development and is now inserting a single-family module so certain single-family projects and larger ADUs will use the objective checklist.
Jones said: "The state continues to pass multiple housing bills all aimed at trying to streamline and increase housing production," and that the revision adds single-family scaled projects and accessory structures to the existing standards while retaining the previously adopted architectural-material rules.
Alan (PlaceWorks), the consultant who drafted the module, explained the standard’s structure: the document now identifies the specific pages relevant to single-family projects and contains two pages of general building standards that apply only to single-family development. He said one requirement is that if a development consists of more than 25 individual single-family buildings, applicants must apply multiple architectural styles rather than repeating a single style. Alan described that requirement as intended to avoid large, repetitive monocultural neighborhoods.
Commissioners asked for clarifications about which projects would be subject to the standards (Jones said they apply to multifamily, mixed-use, and certain single-family projects using streamlined state processes, and that SB 9 projects are excluded). Commissioners also discussed phased developments and whether the total number of homes across phases or each phase’s release schedule would trigger the multi-style threshold; staff said they would treat the total number regardless of phasing.
Staff recommended adoption of the revised standards; Commissioner Watson moved to approve and Commissioner Hagel seconded. The motion passed 4-0.
The adopted changes give staff and applicants a tailored checklist for single-family-scale projects processed under state streamlining provisions and maintain the document’s architectural style options and material standards.
