Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conservator Report topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State conservator: Lancaster ISD remains under oversight; urges trustees to rebuild trust after internal recording controversy
Summary
The Texas-appointed conservator told the Lancaster ISD board the district remains under conservatorship and called attention to ongoing challenges meeting exit criteria around board communication and ethics after a trustee posted an audio recording; trustees acknowledged the report and pledged further work.
The conservator overseeing Lancaster ISD told trustees the board remains under oversight and highlighted persistent problems meeting exit criteria tied to board communication and ethics, urging trustees to take immediate steps to rebuild cohesion.
Dr. Francois (the conservator appointed by the commissioner) told the board that although the district has made progress on many corrective items, "exit criteria goal number 3 and GPM 3.2 continue to be areas where trustees consistently have not met the exit criteria standard." The conservator identified a recent incident in which a former trustee posted an audio recording involving other trustees and said that the resulting erosion of trust has ‘‘deteriorated dramatically and requires immediate action to rebuild confidence among and between members." He referenced an earlier letter of advisement issued on May 7 that outlined steps for additional training, disciplinary pathways and legal options.
Board members responded, acknowledging the conservator's report and the need for further work. Secretary Carolyn Morris thanked the conservator for the candid assessment and said she had met with state staff about possible training recommendations. Board President Ty Jones thanked the conservator for the report and said the board would collaborate to restore community confidence.
The conservator noted that progress on other items in the district's action plan gave him confidence that trustees could repair the problem areas, but he urged trustees to follow the advised steps. He concluded his remarks by offering to take questions; trustees did not dispute the conservator's description in open session and said they would pursue additional training and review board operating procedures.
The conservator's comments were presented in open session; some of the incidents he referenced were the subject of prior closed-session reports and an earlier special investigation that precipitated the original conservatorship. Trustees said they would continue to follow the progress plan presented in board materials.
